by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
As most readers know, we
were recently made aware of certain remarks about the
Cassiopaeans made by the authors of
The Stargate Conspiracy which
resulted in a response by us (Ark and Laura).
Picknett and Prince on the Cassiopaeans)
In the previous series of comments, in response to such cavalier
dismissal by said authors, we made a remark as follows:
Again, I am more disappointed in the work of two of my favorite
authors rather than being offended. Nevertheless, to make such
comments as they have, in a public forum, without even being aware
(obviously) of the totality of the material they are criticizing,
its source, its context, and the context of the matters being
discussed on these pages (not to mention by whom they are being
discussed), is reprehensible demagoguery of the most insidious sort.
We find, in this, the idea that these authors are free and
independent thinkers, proponents of remarkable new ideas, and
thorough research may have to be revised. We even begin to wonder if
they are not part of the "damage control" arm of the very "Stargate
Conspiracy" itself? (Even if unconsciously.)
We would here like to retract that remark - in part, that is - and
state that, after having read The Stargate Conspiracy, we
agree almost 100% with its conclusions, but not necessarily the
reasons for the conclusions, nor even the outcome that those
conclusions might suggest. However, again, we will say that it is a
pity they did not more carefully examine the material on these
pages; had they done so, it is our belief that the insights as to
the full nature of this conspiracy, its machinations, and its
ultimate objective, would have been made eminently clear - at least
as far as can be done and still continue to draw breath.
In their introduction, P & P (Picknett and Prince)
tell us that they did not originally start out to write a book of
this sort; they were, in fact, pursuing their own research into
matters brought forward in their previous book: The Templar
Revelation. It was this latter book that impressed us so much
with their determination to "get to the bottom of things." Even
though, as I read it, I could see the evidence of the "misguiding
influence" in operation, time and again they were demonstrating an
ability to not be deceived by using their minds and not their
emotions to follow clues. They came so close.
Their conclusion was that Christianity was, essentially, an
offshoot of the Ancient Egyptian religion of Isis and Osiris -
something that has been stated on these pages from the beginning.
They further concluded that the "most carefully hidden of all the
secrets of the heretical Knights Templar" was that they
believed that John the Baptist was the true Messiah,
and that Jesus was, to say the very least, his usurper.
That is where they were diverted. Yes, it is true that
Christianity is a "fake" religion. It was styled on the
Egyptian "Holy Family" and the teachings of a certain man who
lived in the regions of Palestine around the first century were
quickly covered up and distorted by a "Brotherhood" whose
existence has been theorized for hundreds of years, but who have
forever remained hidden, creating and destroying "red herring"
groups to distract attention from themselves. This group does,
indeed, have an agenda.
The fact is: the imagery of John the Baptist, and all "beheaded"
individuals in mythical, hermetic and occult lore, is a symbol. It
is a symbol of not only an object, but a process of initiation. It
is this process that the "Brotherhood" wishes to keep secret,
and it is the "object" that they wish to control. Apparently,
at some point in this trans-millennial game of Cosmic chess, they
lost their Queen.
But, enough on that; back to the Stargate Conspiracy.
Let me suggest, first of all, that the reader may wish to obtain a
copy as soon as possible and read it carefully. After you have read
it, go back and read the various channeled materials it discusses
with the idea in mind that such material may, indeed, be being
presented with a hidden agenda. And, while reading,
keep in mind that one of the main tactics of the Control
System is to find a means of subtly allying their message
with that of the truly Positive so as to generate confusion
in untrained minds which would tend on surface evidence to accept
these actually contrary messages as benevolent.
The Control System does not inculcate belief by lying
- at least not all the time. The lies, the subtle twists
on the truth, are generally buried deeply in a
soft cushion of warm and tender concern for their "chosen ones."
The Control System proceeds by the method of
imitation. It APES the expression of the positive, and all
the more carefully when it wishes to be mistaken altogether for
truly benevolent intentions.
However, the problem is actually deeper than that. It could be said
that the Shepherd cares tenderly for his flock, guarding and
protecting them; moving them from green pasture to green pasture;
bedding them down for the nights next to pools of cool, clear water.
When they are sick, he tends them; when one of them is lost, he goes
and finds them and returns them to the fold. The image of the
Good Shepherd as a representation of God is brought to us
from the dim primeval past; it is ingrained in us to think of our
Loving Father as a Shepherd, holding the lost lamb,
glowing with beneficence and kindly devotion to his flock.
But, the fact is, nobody is really paying attention to this image
because, if they were, they would realize that the shepherd
only tends the flock so he can shear them and/or eat them.
And in times past, that included regular and numerous sacrifices
to the "Gods."
Now, just think about that for a moment.
The strategy of the Control System is to begin its
work by adhering so closely to the letter of the positive as to be
virtually indistinguishable to all but the most perspicacious
individuals. It installs belief through a sort of rhythmic lull of
entrainment which then permits acceptance of all that is said when
it finally diverges slightly or greatly from the set pattern and
pulls the mind of the believer along with it.
There are so many variations of the strategy that it would be almost
impossible to list them all, but it ranges from Christianity,
Judaism, Islam and most of the worlds
religions of the present time, to the new variations being
promulgated in the present time via dozens, or even hundreds, of New
Age channels and "purveyors" of wisdom. It finds its fullest and
most identifiable expression in the teachings of certain occultists,
including those promoting ritual magick, whether they claim to be of
the "black" or "white" variety. The bottom line is, as the
Cassiopaeans have said over and over again: knowledge protects,
ignorance endangers. And ignorance is substrate of "belief."
"Belief" is, essentially, the "Ostrich School of
Metaphysics." The attitude taken by most New Age purveyors
of wisdom is exactly this "Ostrich" mode, which is merely a
neo-Augustinian dismissal of evil as a "nonentity," or a shadow to
be defined only as the "absence of good."
This is actually a clever maneuver of the Control System
to gather energy. With this idea, people think that the whole
solution to the problem is to "educate" all the "negative" beings
out of their contrary ways... that if they are only "loved enough"
or "helped to see the error of being bad, and how nice it is to be
good," that all will become sweetness and light. Such a doctrine has
no idea of what to do with an evil that is conscious and intentional
and the choice of highly intelligent entities.
One of the tactics of the Control System is to
propagate, expand and exaggerate the magnitude, the horror, and the
despair of information so as to suggest that personal power is a
chimera in the face of collective hopelessness. This results in a
feeling of powerless passivity and ineffectuality. From such
passivity, people are easily moved toward "sources" that seem to
compensate as an "authority" or a substitute for our lost power. The
authority claimed by such a source tends to make us even more
subject to its depredations, and thus weak beyond resistance to any
wholesale negative invasion.
Picknett and Prince began to research ancient
Egypt in order to discover the purported "roots" of the
Templar legacy and what they perceived as our civilizationís "Egyptian
Roots." The more they researched, the more they realized that
the ancient Egyptians possessed "astonishing knowledge, far beyond
that generally accepted by modern academics."
Well, what a surprise!
But, we have to remember that they are writing their book for the
mass market, so we can cut them some slack here.
As they came to this realization, they began to examine the work of
some of the current "alternative Egyptologists," such as
Robert Temple, author of
The Sirius Mystery, Robert
Bauval, co-author with Adrian Gilbert of The Orion
Mystery; and Graham Hancock, author of The Sign and
the Seal. P & P noted:
encompass a vast range of fascinating and radical new ideas,
many of which have now become so entrenched among their readers
as to be accepted as hard fact. And, like most of their readers,
we, too, began as enthralled admirers.
I have to agree that I
was equally enthralled with the same books; that is, until the
Cassiopaeans pointed out the flaws and the agendas. And
those are the same flaws and agendas that P & P discovered by
the simple process of studying the history and looking deeply into
the connections of these individuals to certain "channeled"
teachings. P & P wrote:
After many months of
researching and writing this book, we still admired those
authorsí energy and commitment, but as we stood back from their
work, we have perceived a new and considerably larger pattern
taking shape. Whether or not those authors are aware of it,
their work forms an intrinsic part of what amounts to an
Is that so? Gee, the
Cassiopaeans told us the same things seven years ago. What is
this "orchestrated campaign" supposed to do? Well, P & P
...The idea of a
long dead civilization of Mars has also been
absorbed into this campaign and - like the mysteries of Egypt - has been pressed into service to present a
carefully stage-managed message. Essentially, it proposes that
the ancient gods were extraterrestrials - and theyíre back.
Now, where have we heard
P & P next tell us something we already knew:
...The subtext is
very clever: only certain, chosen people hear their words, and
only certain, chosen people will be part of the revelations to
come. We can hazard a guess at the identity of some of the
chosen, but the others may be rather surprising.
Actually, none of the
others are surprising to us, though we are most heartily grateful to
P & P for the time they took to investigate certain people
about whom we have already written, pointing out that they do,
indeed, have some sort of agenda because we continually catch them
out in behavior that is peculiarly obfuscatory and contradictory in
the extreme: people like
Richard Hoagland and
Tom Bearden, for example. We were unaware of their connections
to certain channeled information and agendas. What we were aware of
was that they seemed to be closely associated with the dissemination
of certain disinformation from a scientific point of view. Now, the
picture is much clearer!
P & P begin their work with a chapter on the Nine Gods of Egypt -
The Great Ennead. After analyzing it, they come to the conclusion
that the present day "agenda" has co-opted images that stood for
certain creative principles. In this, they are partly right.
However, they failed to consider the possibility that such "gods"
did, at some time, directly interact with certain humans, just as
they are doing today, in almost exactly the same context!
Additionally, their knowledge of certain historical facts and
esoteric subjects prevented them from realizing that the Ennead,
itself, is one of the first representations of the Control System in
"scientific" terms of the past.
One of the ways in which they have slipped into this very error,
held vigorously in place by the knowledge filtration system of
present mainstream science, is the comparison of some of the pyramid
texts to a cosmology that presents the theory of the Big Bang. Had
they been doing their homework on this one, they would have realized
that the idea of the Big Bang itself is part of the
Control System -
originating in the concepts of linear time incepted by monotheism.
The fact is, the Big Bang idea is only a theory, and not a very good
one. There are alternative theories of the universe that not only
make better predictions, but make more sense - and they are
discussed among scientists today, gaining more and more support
since the Big Bang theory has failed miserably in its ability to
predict, and the observations are piling up which tend to contradict
I very much enjoyed P & Pís understated commentary on the state of
current "mainstream Egyptology," as follows:
Indeed, mainstream Egyptologists seem curiously blind to the
achievements and beliefs of the very people they have chosen to
They then, quite rightly point out that, in reaction to the
realization that our religions and sciences and cultural norms are
NOT providing a satisfactory explanation of the Order of the
Universe, that a countercultural revolution of the mind is taking
place wherein people of all walks of life have decided to search for
the answers themselves.
Well, thatís good, right?
It could be. Except for one fact: most people simply are not aware
of the Control System. They are not aware that they are,
essentially, pouring new wine into old bottles. The forms and
structures of belief are inculcated into human beings so cunningly,
based on the millennia old Control System plans, that even when they
seek to discover for themselves what is "really out there," most
people only manage to jump out of the frying pan and into the fire.
P & P note:
However, many - but not all - exponents of the
New Orthodoxy who
dare to ípublish and be damnedí appear to be motivated by something
more than a sense of solidarity with a culture that is rarely given
its due. The wave of new books is not just a timely recognition of
ancient Egyptian genius (although of course there is an element of
that, which must be applauded). As we discovered, something else is
involved here, something deeply unsettling.
...Through the mass media, these writer-researchers have promoted
what is essentially a belief system that is not only just as rigidly
dogmatic as the academicsí, but which seems... to have quite another
agenda. The promotion of certain ideas and the fact that the same
ideas occur in several of the most high-profile books about íalternative Egyptí led us to believe that there was a prearranged,
orchestrated move to create a new belief system.
Now, where have we heard that before? Can it be possible that
the Cassiopaeans have been saying the same thing for seven years; that
we, (Ark and Laura), have been desperately working day and night to
present this idea to the public? Whatís more, that we have augmented
these statements of the Cassiopaeans with hard research since we do
not think that substituting one channeled message for another is in
any way conducive to the gaining of true knowledge.
Nevertheless, P & P said about the Cassiopaean material "Like all
such material, it is an insult to our individual and collective
intelligence. Who needs it?"
Yet, the Cassiopaeans are saying the same thing they are saying.
What is wrong with this picture?
In order to understand how this "orchestrated belief system" has
been promoted, by researchers and writers with an agenda, the reader
really needs to have a look at The Stargate Conspiracy. The
commentary on Robert Temple, Robert Beauval, Graham Hancock, and
others, is well worth the read.
Fact is, we have had some peripheral interactions with followers of
these folks ourselves. And, in all cases, we withdrew from
association once we discovered that they were not as open-minded and
sincere about their search for truth as they claimed.
What is of most compelling interest is the information on
Puharich and the possibility that there was a "program" in effect
for a long time designed to teach very psychic kids to learn to
"project" thoughts into the minds of others so as to convince them
that they were channeling extraterrestrials. This is also something
of which we are aware, only it was very recently that we were
apprised of Puharichís possible role in such activity. The Cassiopaeans very clearly told us that there was an "army of psychic
projectors" which they designated as "Thorís Pantheum," which was
being used to influence individuals in positions of power and in the
creative arts so as to have them produce books, movies, television
shows and series - all with an agenda in mind: the same agenda
identified by Picknett and Prince.
P & P go on to describe their research findings - how various
channels, researchers, writers, and other individuals of some
influence in the subject - have had CIA connections, and all seem to
circle around the same "circle." Circles within circles indeed! And
quite a few of them have impinged on our lives as well - generally
quite negatively. For a long time, we thought it was simply because
we were "strange" and involved with such an "off the wall" thing as
channeling. Now we realize that most of them were also involved with
channeled messages - of a very different sort. And it is most
definitely clear after reading the excerpts of some of this material
as dug up by P & P, as well as learning about the backgrounds and
connections of these individuals, why our work has been marginalized
and discounted by these very same people with their own "channeled"
In fact, the reader may be rather surprised to discover just whoís
on first in this one! People you would never guess to have any
connection to "weirdness" such as channeling, apparently do -
including high government officials. (We arenít going to tell - you
have to read the book!)
In the end, however, P & P bring it home to the channeling of
Council of Nine, connecting it to Andrija Puharich, James Hurtak and
his Keys of Enoch, mind programming projects such as
Enochian Magick as promulgated by MacGregor Mathers and
Crowley, possible political manipulations of R.A. Schwaller de
Lubicz, various orders of "Melchizidek," and "Guardians" of various
extraterrestrial sources, including Ashtar, Sananda, and so on. They
make a powerful and convincing case.
What is even more interesting is that they point out that the
groundwork was being laid very early on by such luminaries as Helena Blavatsky and
Alice Bailey. Well, we knew that, also. How?
The Cassiopaeans told us and, following their clues, we researched it
and discovered it to be true. And, in general, that has been the
pattern of the Cís. They give us a clue and send us out to do our
homework because they donít ask us to just believe what they say.
And, of course, the main issue that was missed by P & P was that of
monotheism and its control on the minds of the Western world,
softening us up and setting us up to receive a "New God" at some
point in the not-too-distant future.
At a Cís session of August 1, 2001, the following exchange took
Q: (One of our
e-group members) has been reading some channeled
material that suggests that this planet is a breeding ground for
aliens, and the life cycle of the aliens, as in the reptilians or
whatever, may mimic something like a preying mantis. This material
also alludes to the suggestion that the underground of the earth is
kind of a dormant stage for the female and that it is the male that
is returning, or that does return at the end of each epoch, and that
the focus of this appears to be the Great Pyramid. Is the earth a
breeding ground for some kind of aliens as suggested in this
Q: So, this stuff is just another diversionary channeled message
designed to keep people confused. It looks like the guy has made up
messages out of our worst nightmares, putting the worst possible
spin on it imaginable. So, we can forget this idea?
Q: What is the source of this kind of material? What kind of energy
is behind it?
A: STS mind control signal.
Q: What is it designed to do?
A: Reach those that are programmed to receive.
Q: Let me ask you this: if some of these
STS (Service to Self) programming signals
that are going out, I mean, Iím assuming some of them come from 3rd
density, is that correct?
Q: Do they actually have, like, some place on the planet where these
guys sit around and read science fiction books and get these really
crazy theories and stories that they assemble with some sort of
fiendish glee, and then convert them via computer into the
programming signal code that gets beamed out into peopleís heads,
while the guys who are making up all the space brothers scenarios in
some secret military base or whatever, just fall down on the floor
laughing at what they have just done? That people will believe
anything? Is this possibly something that is going on?
Q: Thatís sick.
(A): Well, if you had their agenda, wouldnít you do
(L): If I was as sick as those puppies, and had the money and
facilities, yeah - I guess thatís what they are doing. They have
probably taken whole H. P. Lovecraft novels, converted
them to programming signals, and beamed íem out for the New Age crowd to
channel and believe! And then they say "My God! The space brothers
or guardian alliance told me! Itís just like Lovecraft said! He must
have been a prophet! Oh my God! Can you imagine?"
(A): But it works.
(L): It sure does.
(A): You see, what this guy R___ is telling us
about, the musician who is working on laser light shows in
conjunction with certain music, is that it is capable of inducing
prolonged altered states of consciousness, and that it will be used
for massive, grand scale programming via the entertainment arts.
Heís telling us about another phase of the program. And itís coming
pretty soon, according to him.
And then, we followed up with additional questions on August 10,
2001 which will be presented in the final chapters of the revision
of The Noah Syndrome, along with the research, exposing the agenda
and the true name and nature of the "God" for which all this global
preparation is being made.
There is another significant point missed by
P & P: and that is that
the nature of our reality is truly not what it appears to be in
literal, material terms. It is in understanding this that we have
any hope to be able to discern what may or may not be beneficial for
those who seek higher knowledge. And, in this sense, we have to
realize that even those channeled sources that P & P discarded as
having an agenda, do very often tell the truth - when it suits their
purposes. Of course, they generally do so with such a subtle twist
so as to have the listener perceive a meaning that is completely
opposite to what is true. In this sense, P & P have tossed the baby
out with the bath water and have missed some of the most important
For example: they make a strong connection between the
the Council of Nine. They fail to take into account that, due to
certain factors that we have analyzed here on these pages, there was
a transmission of positive information via the Ra source. We have
said before, and will repeat it here that we do think highly of much
Ra Material - that which was received prior to the death of
Don Elkins. And again, I point out that the death of Don Elkins was
the end of Ra. The obvious question to ask is: if he was the "agent"
of The Nine, and he was doing such a good job, why would they allow
him to die? The answer is obvious: Donís internal orientation was
positive; his "consciousness directors" brought information through
that was contrary to the agenda of the Control System. It is easy to
read this material and identify which is which. And that leads to
the conclusion that Donís death is not evidence of the negativity of
the contact; on the contrary, it is the chief evidence for the
positive nature of it.
And here I must point out that there have been bleed-throughs of the
negative energies in the Cassiopaean channeling also during the
earliest days. That this might happen was clear to us from the
beginning and we took many steps to avoid or circumvent it. And we
scrutinize the material carefully - and do the research - before it
is presented. Fortunately, such instances have been quite rare and,
of the body of material that exists, most of that which could be
classified as incorrect consists in the assumptions of the attendees
whose remarks and comments are included in same. And, very often,
one or another reader (including yours truly) will believe that an
item is clearly wrong, and time proves it to exactly correct.
In point of fact, since the dynamics of the group have changed in
the past year, it seems that a new level of cleanness has been
achieved even if there was one instance of garbling due to
inappropriate choice for operator.
Again, unlike other channels,
we act as a group channel. And we
constantly monitor and scrutinize the material, watching for signs
of corruption, and ultimately putting it to the test of research for
final evaluation. It would be unconscionable to just receive a bunch
of material and dump it out to the public without checking and
Having said all of the above, what are we to make of P & Pís book in
light of the Cassiopaean material? I think that, in order to make it
clear what a vast difference exists between the Cassiopaean material
and the productions of a myriad of channeled sources of more recent
times, as well as the so-called research of various authors as
documented by P & P, we would like to present here a little "back
and forth" commentary.
One of the most influential books ever written about the mysteries
of Egypt is Robert Templeís The Sirius Mystery, originally published
in 1976. As P & P point out, this book spawned much of the current
P & P point out how
Temple claimed CIA interference in his research
and his life, as well as the fact that the clues to his research
were given to him by high Masonic sources.
We agree with P & P that the "interference" was designed to convince
him that he was "on the right track" and to "validate" his work for
a very different and hidden agenda.
One of the claims of the "New Orthodoxy" is its redating of the Sphinx of Giza (and the pyramids).
John Anthony West discovered, in the works of
R.A. Schwaller de
Lubicz, the suggestion that the sphinx was weathered by water. His
book was entitled
Serpent in the Sky. He proposed that this
weathering was done by flooding and that the last flood took place
around 10,000 B.C. He considered this to be proof of Atlantis as
well as the Biblical Flood.
The issue of the sphinx was brought to the attention of
Dr. Robert Schoch, a geologist from Boston University. Schoch concluded that
the erosion on the Sphinx had, indeed, been created by water. His
work has been confirmed by other geologists. Egyptologists refuse to
accept the evidence of science, preferring the delusions of their
As climatologists can pinpoint the times of rainfall in the past,
this has been used to redate the sphinx.
Lawton and Ogilvie-Herald (page 313) agree with me that the current
arid climatic regime of the Giza Plateau began approximately in the
middle of the third millennium B.C. (circa 2350 B.C. by one standard
dating scheme) and there were various periods of relatively heavy
rainfall from about 10,000 or 8,000 B.C. up until the onset of the
predominant aridity that has existed in the area for the last 4500
years or so.
Now, why is this an issue? Because the
New Orthodoxy wants to insist
on a date of 10,500 BC for the date of the Sphinx and the pyramids.
P & P, of course, have shown that there was no eleventh-millennium
BC wet period, but that does not disprove that either monument was
built then. But, their arguments on this point are weak. On the one
hand, they want to show that mainstream science is abysmally slow in
realizing what is really going on, but on the other hand, thatís
where they go for their proof that any portion of the New Orthodoxy
they donít like is not true. Most peculiar.
Nevertheless, they have a point. Why all the
concentration on 10,500
BC, or "Zep Tepi," as Bauval and
Gilbert have written?
The Cassiopaeans have indicated that the date of the building of the
pyramids and Sphinx coincided and that this date was 8,649 B.C. we
will soon present the research on this date in the Noah Syndrome
which strongly supports such a date and casts serious doubt on any
of the dating of the Egyptian dynasties by the "mainstream experts."
And, we are using climatological and geological data, not
"channeled" material, though the Cassiopaeans did give the clues
about what to look for and when!
As it turns out, P & P certainly demonstrate that
alignment," as he has set it up, is a complete hoax.
The bottom line is:
P & P discover that all of these "high profile"
New Egyptologists are desperately trying to prove that 10,500 BC is,
in some way significant, even when the facts indicate otherwise.
Again we ask: why? Why do they require the minds of so many readers
to be "focused" on this specific time period?
P & P propose the eminently reasonable idea that, since the day of
the first heliacal rising of
Sirius was the
New Yearís Day of the
Egyptians, and that throughout most of their history, the sun rose
in Leo on this day, that it would only be reasonable for them to
have the sphinx represent "feline energy" and face the dawn - much
as our Statue of Liberty represents freedom and faces Europe, from
whence most Americans came.
Is there some secret, mystical power relating to
the day the Statue
of Liberty was put up? How about the year? Shall future "Americologists"
speculate wildly about the mythical significance of Lady Liberty? I
mean, if you have the ability to manipulate stone the way those guys
did, how hard can it be to just whip up a handy stone lion to
decorate the landscape?
Suffice it to say that, while we agree with
P & P that Bauval,
Hancock, et al are really mucking things up with their wishful
thinking and some kind of Control System agenda behind them, we also
think that P & P may have tossed the baby out with the bathwater on
this one too. There may, indeed, be something that the pyramids and
sphinx can tell us about these ancient times. And they may, indeed,
warn about times to come! Just not in any sense that has been
In this sense, P & P note that
Hancock and Bauvalís seem to be
utterly driven to,
"forge a link between the ancient Egyptian First
Time - zep tepi - and the Age of Aquarius... and Mars. Everything
they have written so far appears to us to be geared to making that
connection, with the distinct impression that soon a great secret
will be revealed, and that they are its guardians.
Hints about the nature of that agenda may be gleaned from the
increasingly messianic tone of their recent postings on the
...An intrinsic part of the [agenda] is the announcement of the
return of the ancient Egyptian gods. This may be merely some poetic
turn of phrase or a kind of metaphor; but part of the plan we have
uncovered demands that the gods are real, and that they are
Well, amen! Thatís what they ARE doing. And that is what
the Cassiopaeans have been telling us that they are doing. And whatís
more, the Cassiopaeans have been telling us not only who these
"gods" really are, but that they do NOT have our best interests at
P & P tell us that Robert Temple suggests that the ancient
amphibious gods, the Nommo, who are now in suspended animation
somewhere in orbit around Saturn, are about to return to
says darkly that íthese matters... may affect us all sooner than we
And indeed, Temple is very likely telling the truth - from his
perspective, and based on the plans of the Control System. That he
and the others do not realize that they are dupes of this control
system is the biggest part of the tragedy of what will happen if...
well, we can only wait and watch.
To their credit, P & P are doing their best to point out the danger.
Unfortunately, they have no idea how serious it really is.
P & P tell us about the fascinating interactions behind the scenes
of the discovery of the "Face on Mars." These structures were seized
upon as evidence of an ancient Martian civilization by, among
others, Dr. James J. Hurtak, then Professor of Oriental Studies at
the California Institute of the Arts who, later, carried out some
very secretive work in the Great Pyramid.
...The potency of
Giza as a symbol for disparate creeds ...is, in
itself, something of inestimable value, especially for those whose
business it is to exploit the power of belief systems.
Of all the players in the Giza game, most can be seen to have
definite and easily discernible motivations; for example, Hawass
(the head Egyptian archaeologist) wants to be the worldís leading
Egyptologist, Joseph Schor and ARE (the Cayce people) want to
the Hall of Records (as predicted by Cayce), and so on. The
motivations of certain individuals and organizations who have played
key roles are not so easy to define, such as the enigmatic Dr. James
J. Hurtak and SRI International (the
remote viewing, CIA connected
gang), who seem to have been working together at Giza in the 1970ís.
Far from fading from the picture, Hurtak has recently gone into
partnership with Boris Said (a filmmaker involved in the plot) in
his Magical Eye production company, being listed as their scientific
adviser. [P & P]
My my! Doesnít the plot get thicker! The famous
Dr. Hurtak and his
magical Keys of Enoch! And here he is connected up with
remote viewing and CIA types and the promotion of the idea of the
face on Mars having been left there by a "Martian civilization."
Strange bedfellows if you ask me. The reader will probably be very
interested to discover the strange connections between Dr. Hurtak,
Richard Hoagland, Col. Tom Bearden, Gene Roddenberry and a host of
players too interesting and numerous to mention.
Hurtak was already referring to the Face as íSphinx-like,í making an immediate and emotive connection with
Egypt. Even more intriguing is the fact that Hurtak had
the existence of a Sphinx image on Mars in 1965, the year before the
Viking pictures had been taken. [P&P]
Well, the reader is probably already having a few suspicions that
such a "prediction" could easily have been made to "come true," by
the very organizations that later denied it was a "face," simply in
order to put power in the hands of Hurtak so as to enable him to
promote his Enochian agenda.
Nevertheless, on this subject of an
ancient civilization on Mars,
again, P & P miss the boat. Instead of realizing that the facts are
probably NOT what the Control System are promoting, they offer lame
suggestions ending with the following:
The least likely solution, given our current understanding of
Earthís prehistory, is that they are the work of an advanced
civilization that originated on Earth and traveled to Mars. [P & P]
P & P might wish to increase their "current understanding of Earthís
prehistory" pretty damn quick. And we can assure them that all the
clues are out there for the individual willing to dig for them.
But, getting back to Dr. Hurtak, Hoagland, Bearden,
SRI, CIA, Puharich, and the gang, all of whom seem to be impressed by the idea
not only of the "Nine Gods," the "Council of Nine," but also
the Elohim! We asked the Cassiopaeans about this once, and, considering
our own indoctrination into these very same ideas, their answer was
rather shocking. I mean, after all, when you have been brought up on
the Bible, and the Elohim and all that, what are you going to do
when you are told that such guys may not be what they present
themselves to be and worse still, they may not have your best
interests at heart! (And for P & P who think that all channeling
consists of just telling people what they want or expect to believe,
I can guarantee that this has never been the case here!)
Q: (L) Who were the
Elohim of the Bible?
Q: (L) What does that mean? Transcends definition?
A: And variable entities.
Q: (L) Were the
Elohim ígood guys?í
A: First manifestation was human, then non-human.
Q: (L) Well, what brought about their transformation from human to
A: Pact or covenant.
Q: (L) They made a pact or covenant with each other?
A: No, with 4th density STS
(Service to Self). (Control System)
Q: (L) Well, that is not good! Are you saying that the
STS? Who were these STS beings they made a pact with?
A: Rosteem, now manifests as Rosicrucians.
Q: (L) What is their purpose?
A: As yet unrevealable to you.
Another sacred cow shot down by
the Cassiopaeans was the whole idea
of Thoth Hermes being a "good guy." Now, of course, those who are
"into" this sort of thing (as we were, indeed), can suggest that it
is the Cassiopaeans leading us astray. Sure, we thought about it. It
was always in the back of our minds that anything that was ever said
by any channeled source could, and most often was, either lies,
useless psychobabble, or disinformation. However, with this detailed
expose by P & P, I donít think that such an idea about the
Cassiopaeans holds water anymore.
Q: (L) Who was
A: Traitor to court of Pharaoh Rana.
Q: (L) Who is
A: Egyptian leader of spiritual covenant.
Q: (L) In what way was
Hermes a traitor?
A: Broke covenant of spiritual unity of all peoples in area now
known as Middle East.
Q: (L) Who did
A: Himself; was power hungry.
Q: (L) What acts did he do?
A: Broke covenant; he inspired divisions within ranks of
Egyptians, Essenes, Aryans, and
Persians et cetera.
Q: (L) What was his purpose in doing this?
A: Divide and conquer as inspired by those referred to as
Brotherhood in Bramley book you have read.
Gods of Eden by William Bramley)
Q: (L) Is this the
Brotherhood of the snake Hermes formed in
rejection of unity?
A: Hermes did not form it; it was long since in existence.
Q: (L) Who was the originator of the
Brotherhood of the Serpent as
described in the Bramley book?
A: Lizard Beings.
P & P go to some lengths in describing the hoopla behind the
announcing of "life on Mars" by NASA and the involvement of
and Hoagland, et al. Most curious indeed, since the Cassiopaeans
have definitely stated that this event was part of a planned
progression of events designed to lead to the introduction of
"Martians" as our "gods." The Cís have said that the real, original
inhabitants of Mars were never any such thing:
Q: (L) Was
Mars ever inhabited?
Q: (L) By whom?
A: By those you now know as Sasquatch or Bigfoot.
Q: (L) Do they now live on this planet as a result of being brought
here by other beings?
A: They are transitory. Do not inhabit on a permanent basis.
Q: (L) Well, how do they come and go?
A: They are the slaves and "pets" of the
Q: (L) OK, whatís the scoop on this
Mars Rock? (This session was
held during the week of the "great announcement.")
A: Vague as can be!
Q: (L) Is this rock from
Q: (L) How long have they known that rocks from
Mars are on the
A: 12 years.
Q: (L) OK, Why all of a sudden are they revealing, or releasing this
information about this Mars Rock? In such a big and manipulative
way? (T) You just said it!
A: You have already figured it out yourselves.
Q: (L) Well,
Sheldon Nidle, the author of íBecoming a Galactic
Q: (T) Not
Sheldon and the Galactic Humans! (L) Well, I know they
said no, but they answered my question before I got it out: Sheldon
has made an announcement which was put out on the Net...
Q: (L) So, thereís not going to be a massive
UFO landing between
August 29th and December 31st of this year? (T) Only if you go and
see Independence Day!
A: No comment!
Q: (L) Well, OK, but is this
Mars Rock, and is this opening of the
doors concept, is this leading up to some definite, overt
interaction with aliens? (T) They told us, we know it, yes!
Q: (T) Thatís what itís all about. Theyíre opening it up, and
theyíre going to take the money... If they want to go to Mars to
look for civilizations and stuff, which theyíre going to lead up to,
and back to the moon here, and all this, and theyíre going to make
Hoagland feel really good, because heís right! Theyíve already done
A: Notice how you heard nothing about the Mars Probes until the rock
Q: (T) This is the new stuff?
A: The excavation robot spacecraft. One Probe is already on its way,
another to follow. No further explanation about "loss" of
Q: (L) What did happen to the
A: Blacked out. You see, íToo risky.í And too much too soon, due to
pressure from Hoagland and others.
Q: (T) My own opinion is that theyíve already been there, and they
know whatís there.
A: No. Microbes are easier to swallow than humans in togas!
Q: (T) Cleopatra and Anthony are not going to go over real big this
week! Especially with the Bible scholars. (F) And the scientists!
(T) OK, you just mentioned that somebody from this planet already
launched a Mars Probe. A new Mars Probe, that no one in public knows
about. Because itís never been talked about. So, itís a secret
probe. Who does it belong to?
A: Was secret US government.
Q: (T) Was it something that one of the
Shuttle missions put out?
Q: (J) When did it go up?
A: September of 1995.
Q: (T) Last September, a year ago. So, itís gone for a year. It
takes it a year, two years to get there? Maybe not that long. So,
itís over halfway there at this point.
Q: (T) Whatís it going to do?
A: Next year.
Q: (T) Next year for the next probe?
Q: (T) Is this going to be one of those public ones?
A publicly announced one?
A: They both are.
Q: (T) What is the purpose of these probes?
A: Excavation to display living organisms.
Q: (T) Display? (L) Yes, for public consumption. In other words, not
only do we have a rock now, that shows evidence that there was...
(T) Oh, display, as when they find it and dig it up, theyíre going
to show it on camera! (L) Yes! (T) Connie Kourek will interview it!
(L) Right! (F) First they said they found no evidence, then they
said it was inconclusive... Now, who the hell knows what they found!
In revealing things, weíll start with fossilized life, and then move
on... (L) So, theyíre going to display the discovery of living
organisms on Mars to take the next step to acclimate...
Q: (L) So, in other words, this process is going to be something of
an ongoing thing, and that all of these people who are cranking
around about, you know, alien landings...
A: No faces, though.
Q: (L) Thereís not going to be any
íFaces On Mars?í They are not
going to show us...
A: Wonít be revealed, what do you think happened with
Q: (L) Well, what did happen with the
A: Hoagland forced their hand.
Q: (T) What do we think happened to the
Mars Explorer? I think they
switched channels. They just moved it from one communication post to
another, and itís doing exactly what itís supposed to be doing. And
they did it in such a way, that the NASA people really didnít know
what happened, so that when they were asked, they could say, íWe
donít know what happened to it!í Because they really donít know what
happened! (L) When weíre talking about attack, as we were before, as
in plane crashes, the Olympics, all these different things - this
dealing with these Mars Explorers - is all this stuff, or most of
this stuff, coming from the 4th density manipulations of human
minds, rather than...
Q: (L)... rather than actual, physical entry and doing of deeds? Is
Q: (T) I have a question. Theyíre going to display
like, how did they put that íLiving organismsí? How big are these
living organisms going to be? How advanced?
Q: (T) So, weíre still talking about microscopic organisms here?
Q: (J) So, they wonít wave at us!
A: But these will be alive. Canít you see the progression here?
"Donít want to scare Grandma Sally Bible Thumper/Stockmarket
Q: (T) Is the government planning to stage an invasion by aliens to
cause the populace of the world to go into such a fear state that
they will accept total control and domination?
A: Open. But if so, will "flop".
Q: (T) Why?
A: Many reasons: 1. Visual effects will be inadequate and will have
"glitches". 2. Real invasion may take place first. 3. Other events
Q: (T) Such as what?
A: Earth changes.
Q: (T) Am I correct in assuming that some of these hotshot, bigwig
guys in the government who have plans for taking over the whole
world and making everything all happy and hunky-dory with them in
charge, are just simply not in synch with the fact that there are
some definite earth changes on the agenda? Are they missing
A: Close. They are aware but in denial.
Q: (T) Are these
earth changes going to occur prior to the arrival
of the cometary cluster?
A: No. But "time" frame is, as of yet, undetermined.
Q: (T) Am I correct in saying that if they knew what was really
going to happen that they would still continue with their stupid
little plans to make money and try to control the world?
A: Yes. Greed is a sickness.
Q: (T) Is there such a thing as "alternative three" the plan to take
all the brains off the planet?
Q: (T) Is that more disinformation?
A: Yes. So is Mars landing but not Mars monuments.
Q: (TL) Who made the
monuments on Mars?
Q: (T) So, the
Atlanteans had interplanetary ability?
A: Yes. With ease.
Atlantean technology makes yours look like the
Q: (T) Who created the structures on the moon that
Q: (T) What did they use these structures for?
A: Energy transfer points for crystalline power/symbolism as in
monuments or statuary.
Q: (T) What statuary are you referring to?
A: Example is face.
Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations on
Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million
dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry
the way your society is money hungry. [...]
Q: (T) Are the top echelons of the human race all the fools that
Question is: are the Cassiopaeans
telling the truth? Well, again,
except for the fact that they give answers relating to the total
Control System that has dominated humanity for millennia, what they
are saying is exactly what Picknett and Prince are saying. Only
thing is, the Cassiopaeans said it first.
But, I do understand the position of P & P. Itís one thing to pursue
conspiracy theories and to find them and track them and think that
there are some very naughty folks here on the Big Blue Marble. Itís
an altogether different thing, after one has tracked enough of these
theories, to come to the realization that they are all just
different parts of the same elephant, and that the critter is really
thousands of years old. When that fact smacks you in the face,
either you run screaming in denial, or you begin to step back from
the truly BIG picture, the global-millennial picture, and you see
that there is a very stinky rat somewhere. Having arrived at that
point, you realize that such a conspiracy could not be carried out
by human beings - at least not alone. And then you have to face the
most difficult task of all: asking yourself who or what could be
Having asked that question, you realize that you simply cannot
answer it unless you open your mind to a whole constellation of
possibilities that you would formerly never, ever, in your wildest
dreams have considered. Then, if you work very, very hard, you may
discover the "truth" that THEY want you to believe.
But, if you are very lucky, and you seek help based on the knowledge
you have acquired that such help can and does exist - only we
generally do not have access to it because we are too easily duped
and manipulated - then you might begin to learn the rules of
communicating with higher minds than our own. And doing that, then
there is some hope of sorting out the mess. But it isnít easy, and
it canít be easy.
Will P & P be able to make that
leap of consciousness? Itís hard to
tell. They keep dancing around it in their books, they do some truly
interesting research, but it just seems that the awareness of what
is truly going on is still blocked from them. Thereís a dead
elephant on the living room floor and they donít even seem to see
it. P & P ask:
Are ítheyí [the
secret gov and its dupes] looking for a
wither a physical or hyper-dimensional portal through which they
could more easily reach Mars, and perhaps even make contact with
Martians? More importantly, do ítheyí really believe that such a
How about this: the agenda of The Council of Nine, as channeled by
Schlemmer et al, and other related channeled information, are simply
the instructions of these racist, "gods" to their human "agents" to
do the legwork designed to "lock" something in place so that they
can "move in and take over." As the Cassiopaeans have said:
Q: (L) I read the new book by
Dr. David Jacobs, professor of History
at Temple University, concerning his extensive research into the
alien abduction phenomenon. [Dr. Jacobs wrote his Ph.D. thesis on
the history of the UFOs.] Dr. Jacobs says that now, after all of
these years of somewhat rigorous research, that he KNOWS what the aliens are here for and he is afraid.
David Jacobs says that
producing offspring is the primary objective behind the abduction
phenomenon. Is this, in fact, the case?
A: Part, but not "the whole thing."
Q: (L) Is there another dominant reason?
Q: (L) Replacement of what?
Q: (L) How do you mean? Creating a race to replace human beings, or
abducting specific humans to replace them with a clone or whatever?
A: Mainly the former. You see, if one desires to create a new race,
what better way than to mass hybridize, then mass reincarnate.
Especially when the host species is so forever ignorant, controlled,
and anthropocentric. What a lovely environment for total destruction
and conquest and replacement... see?
And how many New Age folks will be like the cute little crowd of
Gray huggers on the top of the skyscraper holding out the welcome
signs in the movie Independence Day?
P & P tell us:
Few of the enthusiastic followers of the
Face on Mars story realize
that the ideas of both Richard Hoagland and James Hurtak - the main
advocates of the Mars/Giza connection - are largely shaped by a
highly influential cultish group who claim direct, telepathic
communication with extraterrestrial intelligences. These alleged
non-human entities have, we were to discover, adopted many different
aliases over the course of several decades, but today are most often
known as the Council of Nine, or simply íthe
...As we progressed in our investigation... we were astonished, not
to say disturbed, by the influence exerted by the people who believe
in the Nine - and ultimately, the Nine themselves. We gradually
uncovered evidence of the extraordinary hold that these alleged
non-human intelligences have over top industrialists, cutting-edge
scientists, popular entertainers, radical parapsychologists and key
figures in military and intelligence circles. We were to find that
the Nineís influence even extends to the threshold of the
Richard Hoaglandís influential
Enterprise Mission had two directors
of operations... David P. Myers and David S. Percy. Both had
significant roles in the promotion of the
Message of Cydona.
American writer and former US Navy officer Myers joined the team in
1989, and London-based film producer Percy went on board shortly
afterwards. Both left the Mission together in 1992.
Myers who ídiscoveredí many of the key measurements and
angular relationships of the Cydonia monuments on which Hoagland
bases his decoding of the Message. And it was Percy who surveyed the
stone circle of Avebury in order to establish its relationship with Cydonia, as well as with other English sites such as
Glastonbury Tor. However, the source of Myersís
(as Hoagland calls them in his acknowledgment in the Monuments of
Mars) is neither mathematical skill nor deductive reasoning: he and
Percy are part of a network of people who believe they are in direct
contact with a group of advanced godlike extraterrestrials.
It turns out that Myers and Percy hung out with
The Nine. More than
that, James Hurtak claims to have been in touch with the same
extraterrestrial source of wisdom since 1973. Hurtak has told two
different versions of how he was "chosen to receive" the teachings
that became The Keys of Enoch. In one version, he tells how the
prophet Enoch appeared in his room one night. But he later told
Jacques Vallee that he was "programmed" with the info one night by a
"bright light" hovering over his car.
Hurtakís work, like that of
Myers and Percy, describes a system
based on a hierarchy of intelligences that rule the universe, and
explains how they have intervened throughout the history of the
Keys of Enoch is a ...self-consciously religious work...
Subtitled A Teaching Given on Seven Levels To Be Read and Visualized
In Preparation for the Brotherhood of Light To be Delivered for the
Quickening of the íPeople of Light." ...It even looks like a
with the Hebrew letters for Yahweh - YHWH - embossed in gold on its
white-and-gold cover, and its text displayed in two columns and
divided into short numbered verses. This book evidently believes
itself to be very holy, very sacred, taking itself extremely
seriously indeed. The sixty-four íKeysí of spiritual wisdom,
covering all aspects of ethics and history, are presented in
resounding quasi-Biblical language, although it is virtually
impenetrable. For example:
The key to the end of our consciousness time zone is the violation
of the spectra of color codes and in the geometry of radiations
which will explode gel forming capacities. For this reason, the Host
of the Living Light comes to deliver those who are living under and
within the Light of Righteousness. [Hurtak, quoted by P & P]
Wow! Did you get that? Iím sure glad to have such a clear
explication of - well - of something. Sorry, when I read stuff like
that, my brain turns off. I guess itís because Iím not one of the
Have the Cassiopaeans said anything about such matters as described
by Dr. Hurtak?
Q: In a previous session I asked a question about the
Belialí and the ísons of the law of One,í as explicated by
Cayce, and whether these were philosophical or racial divisions. You
said that they were initially racial, and then philosophical and
religious. Now, from putting the information about religions
together throughout the centuries, I am coming to a rather difficult
realization that the whole monotheistic idea, which is obviously the
basic concept of the ísons of the law of One,í is the most clever
and devious and cunning means of control I have ever encountered in
my life. No matter where it comes from, the religionists say "we
have the ONE god, WE are his agents, you pay us your money, and
weíll tell him to be nice to you in the next world!"
A: Clever if one is deceived. Silly truffle if one is not.
Q: Well, I know! But, uncovering this deception, this lie that the
ípowerí is íout thereí is unbelievable. So, the Kantekkians were the
íSons of Belial,í which is not the negative thing that I interpreted
it as at the time. So, the íSons of the Law of One,í was perverted
to the monotheistic Judaism, which then was then transformed into
the Christian religious mythos, and has been an ongoing theme since
A: Woven of those who portray the lights.
Q: And that is always the way it has been. They appear as
light.í And, essentially, everything in history has been rewritten
by this group.
A: Under the influence of others. And whom do you suppose?
Q: Well, the
Orion STS (Service to Self).
A: Sending pillars of light and chariots of fire to deliver the
Q: (L) Thatís heavy! Okay, what is the source of the
íKeys of Enochí
teaching? James Hurtak claims that he was taken up to the higher
realms and that the íKeysí were programmed into him...
Q: (L) The place that he was taken to?
A: Not the place, the message.
Q: (L) What is the source?
A: Various. Research.
Q: (L) One of the questions on the list is: In many of the Sumerian
drawings and literature, the gods, the Annunaki, are described as
eating a plant that grew at the bottom of the ocean, and this plant
was the source of eternal life.
A: Nonsense! The source of eternal life is
Q: (L) Well, the point was that there was some sort of food that
these beings ate that was unusual or different that somehow enhanced
their abilities to an extreme degree...
A: Totally false and you should know it!! All so-called "special
powers" come from nonphysical sources!!!
Q: (L) Carlos Castaneda talks about the "Eagleís emanations," the
Eagle being, I suppose, Prime Creator that emanates down through all
the densities, and that the Nagual who can "see," sees the
a large black and white object. Are they seeing the source, or are
they seeing something on just another density?
A: Source? There is no such thing.
Q: (L) You mean
there is no Prime Creator, no origin or source of
A: You are Prime Creator.
Q: (L) But that is so esoteric... I am talking about...
A: The point is: stop filling your consciousness with monotheistic
philosophies planted long ago to imprison your being. Canít you see
it by now, after all you have learned, that there is no source,
there is no leader, there is no basis, there is no overseer, etc...
You literally possess, within your consciousness profile, all the
power that exists within all of creation!?! You absolutely have all
that exists, ever has, or ever will, contained within your mind. All
you have to do is learn how to use it, and at that moment, you will
literally, literally, be all that is, was, and ever will be!!!!!!!!
Q: (L) That is all fine and dandy and sounds wonderful, except for
one little item. You also say that the monotheistic concepts were
IMPOSED on us to prevent us from knowing this. So, if we are all
that is, how can something exist that can impose something so
unpleasant on us?
A: Choices follow desire based imbalances.
Q: (L) If that is the case, why canít any one just turn off the
lights, end the illusion, and everything becomes nothing?
A: Well, first of all, everything does not become nothing. Secondly,
some have already become everything.
Q: (L) Are these 6th density beings what the Bible describes as a
"gathering" of angels as in the story of Job where "Lucifer" came in
before the Lord...
Q: (L) So, there are
STS (Service to Self) and STO
(Service to Others) at 6th density which balance? And
they are just there, they exist?
A: Reflection for balance.
Q: (L) Is there any kind of hierarchy to this thing? Do these beings
come before some kind of "Grand Council" and make plans and discuss
things, and make decisions and implement them?
Q: (L) Well, how do things happen? Do things just sort of happen as
a natural interaction of things and energies?
P & P introduce us to
The Nine through the agency of Andrija
Puharich who, by the way, was also interested in drug induced
altered states of consciousness. Most of the readers, by now, know
how the Cassiopaeans feel about that sort of thing:
Q: I want you to know you have lost a fan because he was not happy
with what he considered to be "internal inconsistencies" in that you
were NOT favorably disposed toward hallucinations produced by
substances such as Mescaline and Ayahuasca, but yet you recommend
Melatonin because it is a hallucinogen. Then, you said that
spiritual powers could not be obtained through chemicals or plant
type means, but then said that Melatonin exercises psychic
abilities. Could you comment on this?
A: Several comments: First of all, "fan" is short for "fanatic."
Secondly, melatonin does not force an alteration in physiological
brain chemicals, as do mescaline, peyote, LSD, etc. Accessing the
higher levels of psychical awareness through such processes is
harmful to the balance levels of the prime chakra. This is because
it alters the natural rhythms of psychic development by causing
reliance on the part of the subject, thus subjugating the learning
process. It is a form of self-imposed abridging of free will.
Melatonin simply allows the system to clear obstructions in the
brain chemistry naturally, thereby allowing the subject to continue
to learn at a natural pace. And, it is by no means unimportant that
melatonin is a natural body hormone. The other substances mentioned
are, at least in part, synthetic, with the exception of peyote. But
even that is not a natural ingredient of the human physiological
being. And besides, we have already discussed the importance, or
lack thereof, of those who pass judgment upon this exercise, or
Now, as P & P proceed through the most interesting history of
Nine, they make a comment that I really have to mention here:
Another group came from a background of paranormal research. In
1976, after reading Puharichís biography of Geller, Uri, former
airline pilot Don Elkins and Carla Rueckert went to Ossining to meet
him, then accompanied him to Mexico to study the psychic healer Pachita in 1977 and 1978.
Elkins and Rueckert, who ran a Kentucky
based group with James Allen McCarty, were already deeply committed
to the concept of alien intervention by the time they met Puharich.
Elkins began in the mid-1950s as a UFO investigator, then in 1962
turned his attention to extraterrestrial ícontactees,í at which time
Carla Rueckert began to work with him. They founded a group called
L/L Research in 1970, specifically to study such phenomena. After
their Mexican trip with Puharich, Rueckert began to channel
emissary from the Nine, a group entity called Ra. Significantly, the
third member of the trio, James Allen McCarty, who joined L/L
Research in 1980, had already worked closely with a group in Oregon
who had claimed to channel the same entity as Edgar Cayce. [Source
cited: Elkins, Rueckert and McCarty, p. 47)
As I understand it, Cayce never channeled any entities. He actually
"left his body" to "ascend" to read the "akashic records." Somebody
correct me if I am wrong on this one, but I have read that more than
once. Do P & P have information that the rest of us do not? Or do we
lay such a claim at the door of the Ra group?
The fact is, what is actually said in the
Ra Material cited above is,
"In the fall of 1980, he (Jim) traveled from Kentucky to Oregon to
work with this group which was supposedly channeling the same source
that Edgar Cayce had channeled in deep trance. ...After only two
months in Oregon [Jim returned.]"
Not to put too fine a point on it: changing the word from "source"
to "entity" smacks of prestidigitation. Not only that, but two
months sort of doesnít fit "had already worked closely with a
group..." as the sentence is constructed by P & P. How many other
"well researched" items in this book have been similarly twisted so
But P & P were not satisfied with that little manipulation. They
firmly associated Ra with the Nine by writing the following:
L/L Research continues to promote the spiritual teachings of
spoke of a body called the Council of Saturn, based somewhere in its
rings, which protects the Earth and keeps it in a kind of
quarantine. From a session on 25 January 1981, Ra explained (with
very proper godlike disdain for mere earthly grammar and syntax):
"In number, the Council that sits in
constant session, though
varying in its members of balancing, which takes place, what you
would call irregularly, is nine. That is the Session Council. To
back up this Council, there are twenty-four entities which offer their
services as requested. These entities faithfully watch and have been
P & P handily leave out the preceding lines of this excerpt which
The members of the Council are representatives from the Confederation and from those vibratory levels of your inner planes
bearing responsibility for your third density. The names are not
important because there are no names. Your mind/body/spirit complexes
request names and so, in many cases, the vibratory sound complexes
which are consonant with the vibratory distortions of each entity
are used. However, the name concept is not part of the Council. If
names are requested, we will attempt them. However, not all have
Yeah. Sounds like real "godlike disdain."
The fact is, the Cassiopaeans have also talked about the "Zendar" or
"Zindar" council of Saturn. And there is nothing about this council
in either the Cís material or the Ra material that suggests
as promoted by Schlemmer, Hurtak, et al. In fact, I know personally
that Carlaís opinion of the Nine is not far different from ours,
only she is more diplomatic about it.
However, that such entities - of both polarities - exist at
hyperdimensional levels of reality is clearly beyond the pedestrian
minds of such as Picknett and Prince who clearly belong to the
Watson school of investigation.
The fact is: just because a person was interactive with
Puharich, does not mean that they are automatically suspect. In
fact, I have it on very good authority that the burning of
Puharichís lab was the result of the fact that he finally realized
what the conspirators were up to and withdrew his support in horror,
refusing to do any further work for them. He was burned out and
hounded until he died rather mysteriously in a fall down the stairs.
The Nine according to Puharich, in the
days before he "woke up,"
were "directly related to manís concept of God." He further claimed
"controllers of the Universe operate under the direction of
the Nine. Between the controllers and the untold numbers of
planetary civilizations are the messengers. The Nine themselves -
speaking through Dr. Vinod - said: íGod is nobody else than we
together, the Nine Principles of God. There is no God other than
what we are together." [Quoted by P & P]
Well, even if they are 6th density beings, supposed to be at the
level of Unified Consciousness, one "level lower" than
The One, the Cassiopaeans have never made such a claim in those terms.
Q: (L) Al-Arabi describes unified thought forms as being the
of God.í His explication seems to be so identical to things you tell
us that I wonder...
A: We are all the names of God. Remember, this is a conduit. This
means that both termination/origination points are of equal value,
Q: (L) What do you mean? Does this mean that we are a part of this?
A: Yes. Donít deify us. And, be sure all others with which you
communicate understand this too!
So, even though they have stated an identity with the level of the
Names of God, as explicated by the Sufis, they then insist that this
is not a point upon which "deification" rests - that human beings as
the "termination" points are of equal value to any such
Cassiopaeans: All there is is lessons. This is one infinite school.
There is no other reason for anything to exist. Even inanimate
matter learns it is all an "Illusion." Each individual possesses all
of creation within their minds. Now, contemplate for a moment. Each
soul is all powerful and can create or destroy all existence if
[they] know how. You and us and all others are interconnected by our
mutual possession of all there is. You may create alternative
universes if you wish and dwell within. You are all a duplicate of
the universe within which you dwell. Your mind represents all that
exists. It is "fun" to see how much you can access.
Q: (L) Itís fun for who to see how much we can access?
A: All. Challenges are fun. Where do you think the limit of your
Q: (L) Where?
A: We asked you.
Q: (L) Well, I guess there is no limit.
A: If there is no limit, then what is the difference between your
own mind and everything else?
Q: (L) Well, I guess there is no difference if all is ultimately
A: Right. And when two things each have absolutely no limits, they
are precisely the same thing.
Somewhere in there, Puharich was involved in research regarding
psychic surgery. This was an interesting connection because it
brought in the reference to Henry Belk, who I met once at a lecture
I gave. He was not only rude, by talking constantly throughout the
lecture, but he was actually hostile to what I was saying when I
remarked that the so-called "extraterrestrials" were NOT here for
our benefit. I later learned about his interest in psychic surgery
and watched a film he made in the Philippines. Afterward, we asked
the Cassiopaeans about this phenomenA:
Q: (L) Well, obviously since we donít want that kind of thing to
happen anymore, the choice is already made. Okay, I would like to
know, recently I watched a video at J__ H__ís on psychic surgery.
This, obviously, was the real thing. Am I correct in that
Q: (L) No?! What was happening?
A: Fakery and "demonic" influences to delusion, now, strict warning:
avoid at all cost!!
Q: (L) Avoid what at all cost,
Q: (L) Well, that is pretty heavy duty. (F) They almost never say
anything like that.
And it is true. That was one of the few occasions that
the Cassiopaeans issued such a warning. It certainly made me wonder
about what sort of things this Henry Belk was really into. And now
we see that he was associated with Andrija Puharich in this
research, and there is also a government connection going on there.
I guess I was lucky to get away from those people unscathed!
Now, I will point out that I noted several items delivered by
Nine, quoted by P & P that have come up in our own research in a
peculiar way. Again, this is historical work and will be included in
the revised Noah Syndrome, so I wonít go into it specifically. But
& P gleefully pounce upon each perceived error as proof of the lying
nature of the contact. Again, just because they may not have our
best interests at heart, and on this point, regarding the Nine, I
most heartily agree, it still doesnít mean that they are lying on
obscure points that may or may not be subjected to research of a
So, again, P & P have thrown the baby out with the bathwater. As
the Cassiopaeans have said, regarding Whitley Strieber and his
alien, reptoid controlled inspired revelations:
Q: Whitley Strieber and
Art Bell have published a book about a
"global superstorm." Is any of the information they have given in
this book fairly accurate?
A: Derived from non-human sources known for stark accuracy, when
Q: What makes it convenient at the present time for them to be
A: Fits into plans.
Q: Plans for what?
A: Do we not know already?
And, indeed we do.
Of course, as time passed, Hurtak decided that his "source" had to
be higher than "The Nine." By this time, The Nine had made a few
embarrassing predictions that didnít pan out, and a number of people
were having serious doubts about them. However, that is a minority
compared to those who subscribe to the racist, dominator, patristic
system of the Nine which is, in fact, very similar to the tone of
Val Valerianís new "Final Incarnation" nonsense.
According to Hurtak, The Nine are the intelligences that govern our
solar system only and that there are higher authorities known as the
Great White Brotherhood with whom he, and only he, is in contact.
Well, again, this was a pretty sacred cow. We asked about it one
night and I was highly offended when the Cassiopaeans sort of
whizzed past it as though it were nonsense. Well, I am now beginning
to see why.
Q: (L) I have read a number of things recently purportedly channeled
by the "Great White Brotherhood." I would like to know if there is
such a thing?
Q: (L) There is no "Great White Brotherhood?" (SV) How come
Cayce talked about it?
A: Not as such.
Q: (L) What is it that they have been calling the "Great White
A: Various STO (Service to
Q: (L) Do they identify themselves as the
Great White Brotherhood?
Q: (L) If they are not the "Great White Brotherhood," what are they?
A: Fourth density STO.
Q: (L) What is their purpose or work?
A: Complex, suggest you wait and see.
Q: (L) Are we going to be contacted by the
Great White Brotherhood?
The previous remarks suggest that the true "Great White Brotherhood"
may not, in fact, identify themselves as such very often. And,
knowing what we do about the tricks and traps of the Control System,
they are far more likely to identify themselves that way so as to
deceive. In fact, other than the above specific mention, every other
time the word "brotherhood" has been used by the Cassiopaeans, it
has been in a negative context. Here are a few examples:
Q: (L) Who was the originator of the
Brotherhood of the Serpent as
described in the Bramley book?
A: Lizard Beings.
Q: (L) Well, do you have any suggestions?
A: World will soon have nothing but credit and debit have you not
heard of this new visa debit cards this is the future of money as
controlled by the world banking system i.e. the
Lizards i.e. antichrist.
Q: (L) If I donít have a credit card then I donít have to belong to
A: No. You will have no choices: belong or
Q: (L) What happened to
A: Brotherhood aka
Lizards aka antichrist has interfered with free
will for 309000 years. They are getting desperate as we near the
Q: (L) And who is this Beast?
New World Order aka
Brotherhood aka Lizzies aka antichrist.
Q: (L) What is the true source of the brotherhood of the snake in
terms of human members?
A: Adam and Eve.
Q: (L) Were
Adam and Eve real people?
Q: (L) A group of people?
A: Thought pattern change not a giving into temptation.
Q: (L) What or who were these people? What country did they live in?
A: All people. Realm border crossing.
Q: (L) You mean this occurred at a time when
realms crashed or
crossed each other?
Q: (L) Did this involve a war of some sort between one group of
beings and another group?
A: Realm crossing has many manifestations.
Q: ...What I want to know is who has the power and ability to set up
these kinds of "confirmations" or synchronicities?
A: Same forces spreading disinformation: Brotherhood/ consortium/
New World Order/ "Antichrist"/ Lizards.
But getting back to
the Nine. It seems that, after awhile, The Nine
announced that they were the supreme high god of the Egyptians,
As the "Nine Principles of Egypt embodied as One,"
the Nine claim to
be returning to Earth to help mankind at a critical stage. The Cassiopaeans said something about this once:
Q: (L) Next question: I would like to know what is the "Council of
Nine," as I have read about in several books. Now, there was an
ancient council of nine, and then there is the one talked about by
Phyllis Schlemmer. Are there any references on the council of nine
that you can give us?
A: Partial deception.
Q: Partial deception in the ancient references, or the modern ones?
A: Take ancient references and interpret modern accounts according
to current events profile.
As P & P note: "Suspending disbelief for the moment, the disturbing
possibility is that they are simply stating the truth."
No kidding. But I can guarantee it isnít to "help us."
One of the chief concepts of the Nine is that the
Earth was an
"experiment in free will" that went wrong and if we just hold our
mouth right, they will come in and fix things up for us as they have
over and over again. This is, essentially, the idea that is being
presented by dozens, hundreds of channeled sources. Here is another
Q: (L) Now, I have some articles in this magazine here: This is
Lyssa Royal and she has "channeled for thousands around the globe
since 1985. Her books and magazine articles are published in six
languages worldwide. Etc., etc.," She writes here: "The human
consciousness is roughly divided into three different areas for the
sake of this illustration: the conscious mind, the subconscious mind
and the unconscious mind." Now, are these labels generally correct?
Q: (L) She says: "The
unconscious mind is a link to your greater
self, it is also used as a wasteland where scary, dark things are
stored that you really donít want to bring up." Is this a fairly
Q: (L) Is there anything you can say to make the statement more
A: The unconscious mind is also a conduit for connecting with the
higher self, other selves, and the universal mind.
Q: (L) Lyssa also says: "When you are a child and have a traumatic
event, the subconscious not only finds a way to immediately process
the information and store it, but also to protect you from further
fragmentation. It must seek to create a balance." So, she says, the
"very intense raw energy that is generated from trauma gets stuffed
into the unconscious mind." Is this true?
A: Close enough.
Q: (L) She then goes on to say: "When an
extraterrestrial looks at
us, we seem like multiple personality cases to them because of our
mind divisions." Is this true?
Q: (L) Why is that irrelevant? Is it because when a higher density
being looks at us they know what they are looking at?
A: Yes. They know and understand the separations of your minds quite
precisely. That would be like saying "when a human looks at a
rodent, they notice that they are excessively furry."
Q: (L) She goes on to say: "The
ET often does not know how to
communicate with a fragmented human. Sometimes they fly their ships
by and few people may see them, but the greater percentage do not
see them as that data gets sucked into the subconscious and the
triage occurs." She means triage in the sense of the mind being so
flabbergasted that it immediately shunts information into the
unconscious. Is this true, that ETís are having problems
communicating with us because we are the oneís blocking contact?
Q: (L) Is it true that some people may not see
ETís or UFOís because
they block it from their own minds?
A: This can happen or the blockage may be inspired by the alien.
Q: (L) Now, she says: "For the most part, the average person in
society does not know how to interpret telepathic contact... (Lyssaís
alien talking) in the moment you start perceiving us reality starts
shifting because, remember, you are one frequency and we are
another." Is this true?
A: It is irrelevant.
Q: (L) Why is that irrelevant?
A: This is not an obstacle, as suggested by this statement.
Q: (L) Anyway, the article goes on: "So an
ET walks up to you in
your backyard and for a fragment of a moment you may perceive us.
But what commonly happens is that the human will suddenly shut down
usually by becoming very sleepy and falling into a sleep or type of
trance state such as one that is produced by alpha or theta brain
waves." Is this true? When a person sees an ET do they just turn off
from the shock? Is this why most ET contact is not remembered?
A: It can happen but does not usually.
Q: (L) It says that when you start clearing out the stuff in your
subconscious mind that the first layer that comes out of the
subconscious is simply the top layer of priorities that were given
to your subconscious mind to store and process. For the most part
the first layer is not scary. It represents procrastinated
perceptions that are waiting for processing by the conscious mind...
then you start peeling off more layers through hypnosis or
meditation and then...
A: We do not wish to further critique this as we can give all
relevant and related information when needed. You are "comparing
notes" which is fine if in moderation, but remember, separated
sources are subject to variable corruption.
Q: (L) The whole point of this article is to say that
abduct people are here to help us evolve and that it is only us, if
we have dark and dirty unconscious minds, who perceive them as
A: Wrong, you do not need "help" evolving, nor does anything else.
Q: (L) Well, the thing that concerns me about this particular point
of view is that a lot of people are using this to rationalize ETís
abductions... can I read you just a little more?
A: Overall gist is enough for us.
Q: (L) This woman here,
Dorothy Ann claims she channels dolphins and
whales. Dolphins and whales are telling her that they are here to
keep frequencies and to awaken energy centers on the earth, and that
they are very high level beings, for eons they have kept the
electromagnetic grids in the oceans, they follow the old paths etc.
The grids are now in the process of being reset and the whales will
be instrumental in this change of the vibrational patterns on the
Q: (L) The dolphin kingdom has been empowered to communicate more
easily with humans; the whales are awakening to their mission of
greater contact and communication with other beings...
The Cassiopaeansí have said: "Remember,
free will is the most
important law of consciousness in creation." That doesnít sound like
Earth as the "Only Planet of Choice" and now we screwed it up for
everybody! Of course, that begs the question of why we are in such a
mess as we are now.
Q: (L) You have said on occasion that
free will is the most
important law of consciousness in creation. Why can we not exercise
our free will and refuse to be abducted and experimented upon?
A: Those who abduct are exercising their
free will in doing so.
Q: (L) Why does their free will have precedence over our free will?
A: Why does your free will have precedence over density 2 and 1
And that is the crucial point.
We are cattle to these beings.
Nothing more, nothing less. And like cattle, we are "cared for" and
fed or culled when the herd gets too large. And that brings us to
our next point: racism. Again, it is raising its ugly head in the
teachings of The Nine, as well as many other channels, including, as
P & P point out, older ones such as Helena Blavatsky and
How does the Control System "cull the herd?" Why,
war, of course.
And how do they select who gets to be culled? Probably based on who
has the most spirit of resistance - the ones that keep running away
or who cause problems are the ones that get noticed and singled out
for the slaughterhouse. In our case, it is always vast numbers of
our fellow human beings.
But, getting back to the issue of racism:
the Nine say that the
seeding of Earth was an experiment by the Nine (and the
see how "the originals" (the black races) would evolve in comparison
with "those that colonized." The black race was, then, a kind of
"control," as P & P put it, and they are not like all the other
races who are - essentially - space gods.
Well, I guess this is another point on which
differ, and which is supported by scientific evidence as written
about in the Wave series. The first point of major divergence is
that the Cassiopaeans say that the whole "Hoova" thing is nonsense.
But, they do confirm the strange appearance of the Aryan type on the
planet as being an unusual event - but that this was merely the
result of the destruction of a fifth planet in our own system and
refugees from that planet were brought here in an emergency.
And why did that planet suffer destruction? Because the people on it
- Aryans - were so negative they destroyed it. Does that sound like
an edifying bunch of space gods to you? Sounds kind of crazy too.
But, nevertheless, they are here and it is most definitely true that
geneticists have a hard time explaining any of it, especially the
disappearance of Neanderthal at the same exact time. Scientists also
claim that there were no modern type humans on the planet before the
appearance of these "homo sapiens sapiens," but the archaeological
record does not support their claims, try as they will to filter the
information and control what "outsiders" discover. For but one
example, have a look at Michael Cremoís book "The Hidden History of
the Human Race." And donít listen to the rabble rousing "academics"
who scream "foul" over this book. Read the book and then go to the
original sources. Use your own judgment when evaluating the evidence
provided by the mainstream scientific community as opposed to the
"revisionists." I am certain that anyone who accepts this challenge
will be convinced that man has been in his present state of
development for a lot longer than any of us have been taught to
We asked the Cassiopaeans about the "racial" issues:
Q: (L) Are the
Aryan/Celts who came to this planet from the other
one that was destroyed, were they, when they came, in any way
superior to the humans already here?
Q: (L) What was the nature of this superiority?
Q: (L) Physical or mental?
Now this, right here, is a complete reverse of what racial
supremacists would like to claim. The Cassiopaeans have clearly
stated that there was NO mental superiority to the Aryan group.
Whatís more, the next question will clarify it further.
Q: (L) Well, blond haired, blue-eyed people seem to be somewhat more
delicate or thin-skinned compared to, say, the blacks.
A: In this environment on surface.
And we have to remember that these people are suggested to have come
from a much colder planet which received less light from the sun.
And so, it was only natural for them to choose to live in areas that
were extremely cold and inhospitable to the natives of this planet.
Q: (L) Which race on earth is the oldest?
A: All are same.
Q: (L) Even the Aryan/Celts from the other planet?
Q: (L) Why are there different races?
A: Many reasons. Experimental creations. Partly.
Q: (L) Where did the Orientals come from?
A: Same as all others. Result of experimentation.
Q: (L) Did they originate on this planet? Are they native to this
A: Both. Orientals reserved for souls most advanced;
aggressive; Negroes most naturally attuned to earth vibrational
frequency. So are "Native Americans".
Q: (L) Is Caucasian different from Aryan or Celtic?
A: Aryan subgroup Caucasian.
Q: (L) Who were the blue skinned people written about in
Q: (L) Were the Aryans originally blue skinned?
Q: (L) Why did
the Vedas talk about blue-skinned people and why are
there blue skinned people in remote areas of the Appalachians?
A: Are whites real "white"?
Q: (L) Were there ever any really blue people?
A: No. They were perceived as blue due to thinness of skin and
contrast with native population.
Q: (L) Are the Orion STS the
infamous redheaded Nordic aliens?
A: Yes, and all other humanoid combinations.
Q: (L) Okay, if it started with the
Nordic types, and that is where
the other humanoid combinations came from, what genetic combinations
were used for human beings? Black people, for instance, since they
are, in appearance, so unlike "Nordics?"
A: The Nordic genes were
mixed with the gene pool already available
on Earth, known as Neanderthal.
Q: (L) What was the genetic combination used to obtain the
A: Orientals come from a region known in your legends as "Lemuria,"
and are a previous hybridization from 7 genetic code structures from
within Orion Union, designed to best fit the earth climate and
cosmic ray environment then existent on earth.
Q: (L) Okay, what about the
Semitic and Mediterranean peoples?
A: Each time a new flock was "planted," it was engineered to be best
suited to the environment where it was planted. Aryans are the only
exception, as they had to be moved to earth in an emergency.
Q: (L) If
races are engineered on earth to be "best suited," what
factors are being drawn from or considered regarding the Semitic
A: They are not engineered on earth, but in Orion lab as all others.
They were "Planted" in the Middle East.
Q : (L) What genetic type were the
A: They were the same as the "Native Americans."
Q: (L) I want to get back on my question that you have not
answered... I want to know who, exactly, and why, exactly,
genetically engineered the Semitic people, and why there is such an
adversarial attitude between them and the Celts and
A: It is not just between the Jews and
Celts, if you will take
notice. Besides, it is the individual aural profile that counts and
not groupings or classifications. But, to answer your question:
there are many reasons both from on and off the planet.
Q: (L) Why was
Hitler so determined, beyond all reason, even to his
own self-destruction, to annihilate the Jews?
A: Many reasons and very complex. But, remember, while still a
child, Hitler made a conscious choice to align himself with the
"forces of darkness," in order to fulfill his desires for conquest
and to unite the Germanic peoples. Henceforth, he was totally
controlled, mind, body, and soul, by STS forces.
Q: (L) So, what were the purposes of the
STS forces that were
controlling Hitler causing him to desire to annihilate an entire
group of people?
A: To create an adequate "breeding ground" for the reintroduction of
the Nephalim, for the purpose of total control of the 3rd density
earth prior to elevation to 4th density, where such conquest is more
difficult and less certain!
Q: (L) Do you mean "breeding ground" in the sense of genetic
A: Yes. Third density.
Q: (L) Did they accomplish this goal?
Q: (L) So, the creation of the Germanic "Master Race" was what they
were going after, to create this "breeding ground?"
Q: (L) And, getting rid of the
Jews was significant? Couldnít a
Germanic master race be created without destroying another group?
A: Because of 4th density prior encoding mission destiny profile.
Q: (L) What does that mean?
A: This means encoding to activate after elevation to 4th density,
thus if not eliminated, negates Nephalim domination and absorption.
Jews were prior encoded to carry out mission after conversion,
though on individual basis. The Nazis did not exactly know why they
were being driven to destroy them, because they were being
controlled from 4th density STS. But, Hitler communicated directly
with Lizards, and Orion STS, and was instructed on how to create the
Q: (L) And they were going to use this as their basis to introduce a
new blend of the Nephilim... (RC) And the
New World Order... their
version of it. (L) Well, what is the plan now?
A: We cannot tell you this yet, as you would seek to reveal it
prematurely, leading to your destruction!!!!
Q: (L) I have thought about my question from the last session and I
want to ask it this way: You have said that Hitler received
instructions from higher density beings about creating a íMaster
Race.í Why were the Aryan genetic types seen to be more desirable
for creation of this Germanic ímaster race?í
A: Both, similarity and ancestral link most unblemished from
3rd and 4th density stock.
Q: (L) So they were essentially trying to breed a group of people
Q: (L) Okay. They were preparing this breeding ground, so to speak.
Obviously this was for the introduction of some other genetic
strain. What was this?
Q: (L) Well, if the
Nephilim are coming in ships, 36 million of
them, why bother to create half-breeds here?
A: Yes, but having an "advance party" makes 3rd density conquest
Q: (L) So, this
Master Race was supposed to get everything ready...
Q: (L) Okay, what is it about the
Semitic genes that was considered
to be so undesirable in the creation of this íMaster Race?í
A: Would blemish genetic characteristics inclined to ruthlessness
Q: (L) So, you are saying that there is something, some
tendency or set of genes in the Semitic type that would counteract
Q: (L) But isnít the nature of a person determined by their
not the physical body?
A: Partially, remember, aural profile and
karmic reference merges
with physical structure.
Q: (L) So you are saying that particular genetic conditions are a
physical reflection of a spiritual orientation? That the soul
match itself to the genetics, even if only in potential?
A: Yes, precisely.
Q: (L) So a personís potential for spiritual advancement or unfoldment is, to a great extent,
dependent upon their genes?
A: Natural process marries with systematic construct when present.
Q: (L) Well, if that is the case, and the
aliens are abducting
people and altering their genes, can they not alter the genes so
that higher level souls simply cannot come in?
A: Not incarnative process, natural biological processes.
Incarnative involves strictly ethereal at 5th density and lower, and
thus is enveloped in triple cycle "veil" of transfer which is
impregnable by any means. However, any and all 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and
4th processes can be manipulated at will and to any degree
technology is sufficient.
We see in the above a clear statement that
all races are "created"
or "manipulated" and "seeded."
ALL of them. And this is supported by
genetics research which suggests that all human beings go back to
just a handful of "mothers." Now, of course, one of those "mothers"
may very well have been an original DNA "pool" in a laboratory on
some floating space barge.
But, we see the Nine - and many other popular sources of today who
focus on "bloodlines" - and so forth, laying the groundwork
new kind of racism. Are they planning to cull the herd again?
And we see, of course, why they want to focus on their
types - ruthlessness and domination, eh? Just like them. And letís
not have any peaceful mixing of the genes here! That might produce
people who are too balanced and difficult to control!
Ah, what tangled webs they weave!
P & P tell us:
By now it is plain that
the Nine are behind the messages of Giza and
Cydonia, and that all three are now inextricably entwined in a sort
of inescapable juggernaut of the ítruth.í It is impossible to have
one without the other, thanks to the sterling work of the
intelligence agencies, who ensure that this new belief system is
constantly being topped up with new rumours and counter rumours, so
that we will never fail to be gripped by the unfolding story. But
welded firmly on to a very reasonable interest in the mysteries of
Mars and the secrets of ancient Egypt lies the insidious presence of
the Nine and their ever-eager disciples.
...The same individuals play major parts in all three stories. The
prime example is James Hurtak, the ultimate guru, who channels
Nine, was Puharichís second-in-command at Lab nine, was the first
person to make the Mars-Egypt connection public, and was - and still
is - also a major player in the events at Giza.
There is also the involvement in all three stories of
SRI, an organization with intimate connections with
defense and intelligence
communities in the United States. SRI crops up in
Giza, in the Mars
story, and, through its involvement with Puharich, in the events
surrounding the Nine.
Thanks to this complex, often covert, input from clever men and
women, what seems to be happening under our noses is the creation of
a new belief system that efficiently brings together many different
elements in order to broaden its appeal as much as possible.
...This is a conspiracy of enormous proportions, so successful that
it is impossible to pinpoint any one person or group as the real
controllers, although we have catalogued those they use. We have
seen how the Nineís circle were and are supported by very wealthy
people, such as Barbara Bronfman and Joyce Petschek, but it is
unlikely that they are in on the secret; they are too easily
On this point, I believe that
P & P are exactly right. And when we
look at a conspiracy of this magnitude, that has operated,
essentially (if P & P had done their homework, they would realize
this) for millennia. And all the "front men" are just that: red
herrings to draw our attention away from the true source of the
manipulation: the 4th density Matrix Control System Programmers.
And then, we have "damage control" specialists like
P & P who come
along and "tell the truth," and even lay it at the door of some of
the truly conspiratorial parties. But over and over again, in
certain terms, P & P demonstrate a real lack of depth in their
perceptions and their research. They also demonstrate that most
peculiar habit of disinformation artists of giving things only a
very slight twist so that the percipient is certain that they are
telling the truth, but the "truth" that is perceived is subjectively
But, before I give away the whole book, which is jam packed with fun
facts and jolly rumors relating to the plans of the Control System
to unite us into a one world religion under the benevolent creator
race from Mars, with the kind assistance of
Bearden, James Hurtak,
Andrija Puharich, the
CIA, NSA, and
probably even the BSA if the truth were known, let me just say that
if pedestrian materia-inded thinkers like Picknett and Prince have a
clue that something "not quite right" is going on behind all this,
it does not bode well. The veil is gradually slipping away...
But again, too bad they threw so many babies out with the bathwater.