Contents

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Cold Fusion

by Dan Sewell Ward
from LibraryOfHalexandria Website

 

Cold Fusion is the fusion of nuclei at temperatures approaching room temperature. This is a process distinct from Hot Fusion, in which experiments for the last forty years have attempted to duplicate the temperatures and pressures of the Sun (hot and intense!) by the use of plasma physics and such things as Tokamaks and other clever, but useless devices. The difficulty, of course, is that hot fusion has been receiving millions upon millions of dollars annually for four decades in a vain attempt to create a fusion reactor capable of providing energy.

 

The very idea that this massively funded attempt is a total waste of time, money, and talent -- and the whole thing could be done in the kitchen or a garage workshop -- is a bitter pill for the priesthood of the scientific establishment to swallow.

Well, they’ve done it again! And we can all, for the nth time, try to incorporate yet another paradigm shift in our thinking to account for the latest in the science originally termed "cold fusion". To quote Norman Horwood’s [1] increasingly appropo comment, "Life is difficult enough without people inventing things." How true! And in today’s world, scientists, inventors, and entrepreneurs of every stripe are inventing things on a massive scale -- and in the process, making life difficult for virtually anyone with a vested interest in the status quo (which by recent estimates, amounts to about ninety-seven percent of the population).

To put it all into perspective, however, it might be worthwhile to consider a brief history, a review of the past years when cold fusion (which has become identified with: "space energy", "Zero-Point Energy", "vacuum energy", "quantum energy dynamics", and in a more logical term, "nucleodynamics") has become a household word. It all began, of course, with the well-publicized announcement of Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons on March 23, 1989, of their having achieved "excess heat" from what was supposedly a simple (at least in theory) electrolysis experiment [2].

This was followed by a mass denial from "establishment" science (particularly the now increasingly defunct "hot fusion enthusiasts"), and replication of the phenomena in laboratories which had the technical competence and took the time to properly conduct the experiment. But the overall furor generated by the initial news conference and its immediate aftermath was enough to send any rational cold fusion scientist underground for many years. Small wonder, considering the viscous and wholly unscientific nature of the attacks on the experiments -- not to mention the experimenters!

Within five years, however, when the results of the Fourth International Conference on Cold Fusion, began to make their presence felt, it was clear cold fusion was rapidly maturing and had begun the laborious process of gaining adherents, including those with financial backing.! But it was the fifth conference (ICCF-5) in Monte Carlo in April 1995 that really brought cold fusion into the mass consciousness. For it was in Monaco that the "Demonstrations" began, when Hal Puthoff’s "One-Watt Challenge" [3] was answered in a host of ways.

From the solid state proton conductors with their alleged huge power factor of available electricity to the water-implosion devices with their excess shaft horsepower, scientists of every stripe were presenting devices which apparently generated power in useable quantities and forms. Legitimate denial was no longer possible in the face of these devices which provided excess energy in such convenient packages. I say "legitimate denial", because it was this same conference which generated the incredible, and what with hindsight one can only label abhorrent, backlash from vested interests.

Foremost among the attackers, of course, were the utilities; at least the ones who had the foresight to see their industry doomed. The automobile, trucking, railroad, and airline industries did not immediately see that they were but a different species of dinosaur, but they soon weighed in as well with their attempts to deny, discredit, and denigrate cold fusion and all that it represented for the future. To be honest, one can appreciate an industry, such as the utilities, wincing a bit when they see their massive infrastructure turning from an enormous financial asset to an equally enormous liability. Still, it is unfortunate they chose to use such despicable tactics, ones which, incidentally, with the aid and abetment of governments such as the United States, very nearly succeeded. But such is the stuff of momentous, earth-shaking paradigm shifts.

Sadly, much of the scientific establishment chose to attack cold fusion and nucleodynamics as well. Even the relatively simple concept of distinguishing electrodynamics (the science of electrons in motion) from nucleodynamics (the science of protons and nuclei in motion) was a paradigm shift too large for many establishment scientists to make. Given this reluctance, it is all the more obvious they would have difficulties with such challenges as:

  • Experimentally-supported, theoretical understandings of such concepts as inertia, the EPR Experiment, faster-than-light protons, capillary fusion, and multiple-dimensions beyond our known space-time.
     

  • Demonstrations of successfully combining the theories of the Zero-Point Energy, Prigogine’s Self-Organizing theories, and Chaos Theory.
     

  • Excess energy, in the form of heat, electricity, and shaft horsepower, being generated in a variety of ways in which the only common ingredient is the use of protons and/or nuclei in non-linear motion.
     

  • Enhancement of excess energy effects when experimental apparatus were subjected to ultrasonic and/or pulsing, non-linear magnetic fields.
     

  • Development and manufacture of small power units suitable for use in homes, buildings, and modified automobiles.
     

  • Environmental restoration, based on the rapidly decreasing levels of power-generating air and water pollution from utility power plants, automobiles, and other fossil-fuel devices.
     

  • Transmutation of elements, including Biological Transmutation and the straight-forward incineration and elimination of toxic and nuclear wastes (as opposed to previous attempts at waste management)

The transmutation of elements, the stuff of Alchemy, was probably the straw that broke the back of most of the remaining, inflexible scientists. Or the work of such stalwarts as Komaki [4] and Kervran in the area of non-radioactive, biological transmutation of elements. For it is in this arena that recent reports once again challenge our credulity.

We could perhaps tolerate such challenges to our lives as:

  • Vehicles which fly without wings (the only purpose of wings being to save fuel, and with nucleodynamics, no issues of energy availability).
     

  • The virtual elimination of international borders as customs, immigration policies, and other relics of the past face the reality of virtually unlimited mobility of technologically-advanced humans (who, incidentally, have no need for highways -- their construction, maintenance, or traffic).
     

  • The potential for weapons which kill with the sheer immensity of the amount of power available, and the same potential for defensive systems. (If one can take energy out of the vacuum at will, it follows that one can put any amount of energy back into the vacuum and thus nullify the effects of a massive surge of energy being use in an attack).
     

  • The societal upheavals as people discover they must learn whole new skills in order to cope, and simultaneously, realize they can live anywhere in the world. (With unlimited energy, one can modify the immediate environment at will and have the mobility to go anywhere they choose.)
     

  • Recent demonstrations of controlled, Levitation devices which use many of the techniques which have tapped into the zero-point, space energy, and which affect the space-time continuum in some very interesting ways.
     

  • The near-term potential for private interplanetary vehicles, piggybacking onto the commercial possibilities of NASA’s successes in utilizing the power from nucleodynamics to make a manned landing on Mars and the journeys to more distant planets (in particular Jupiter and Saturn).

Perhaps we could indeed, deal with these challenges to our paradigm, all of these New Energy Ramifications. But now, we are faced with the culmination of the "cold fusion paradigm shift", a shift spanning a decade and one which is easily the most significant in the history of civilization; a singularity to end all singularities, a bifurcation point which will inevitably lead to chaos and a wholly unknown, unpredicted and unpredictable, new self-organization. It is the idea of biological transmutation of elements implying that living organisms may be already, regularly tapping into the Zero-Point Energy.

 

Furthermore, it is recognized that water, with its unique and incredible properties being only now fully realized, is the predominant player in nucleodynamics. Thus it is a natural, logical extension that humans, being living organisms with an abundance of water in their physical bodies, may well have the same capabilities. The speculation now being put forth, which challenges us all, is that humans, with only the stuff of their minds, may be capable of all the incredible technology which we have seen introduced in the last decades!

Many skeptics may claim that the idea of a human capability which can transmute elements, tap into the Zero-Point Energy, connect Consciousness with The Fifth Element of Connective Physics, manifest reality in whatever manner the human mind determines, is just so much poppycock. Unfortunately for such naysayers, the last decades of scientific innovators successfully transmuting "poppycock" into scientific and established reality does not bode well for a too-quick dismissal of this concept.

More recently, in February 2002, Infinite Energy magazine reported on an official U. S. Navy Technical Report 1862, in which a Dr. Frank E. Gordon (Head, Navigation and Applied Sciences Department, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego) made the following statements:

“As I write this Foreword, California is experiencing rolling blackouts due to power shortages. Conventional engineering, planned ahead, could have prevented these blackouts, but it has been politically expedient to ignore the inevitable.

 

We do not know if Cold Fusion will be the answer to future energy needs, but we do know the existence of Cold Fusion phenomenon through repeated observations by scientists throughout the world. It is time that this phenomenon be investigated so that we can reap whatever benefits accrue from additional scientific understanding. It is time for government funding organizations to invest in this research.”

There is also the disturbing report of one journalist, who recently visited a research facility known for its track-record of credible contributions to nucleodynamics. According to the journalist, he was just outside one of the laboratories when he distinctly heard someone yell, "Shazzam!". This was immediately followed by a distinctive flash of lightning just above the building, along with a deafening clap of thunder.
 

References:

[1] Horwood, N., quoted by Tinsley, C., "How the oil age ends", Cold Fusion, Vol. 1, No. 2, June 1994.
[2] Pons, S., and Fleischmann, M., Business Week, May 8, 1989.
[3] Puthoff, H. E., "Alternative Energy Sources: Good News/Bad News and ’The 1-Watt Challenge’," Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Energy, Denver, Colorado, May 12-15, 1994.
[4] Komaki, H., "An Approach in the Probably Mechanism at the Non-Radioactive Biological Cold Fusion or So-called Kervran Effect (Part 2)," Poster presentation at the Fourth International Conference on Cold Fusion, Maui, Hawaii, December 6-9, 1993.

Back to Contents


 

 


Mass
The Illusion of Mass

by Dan Sewell Ward
from LibraryOfHalexandria Website

Fundamental to some of the most basic philosophical and spiritual traditions of the world is the concept that “matter” -- the material that makes up what appears to be real to our senses -- is in all respects illusionary. It is what has been referred to as maya, and has no basis in reality -- other than perhaps as a distraction to humans searching for meaning.

Physicists refer to matter and the material world by a term called mass -- “a coherent body of matter of indefinite shape” (a definition which might apply to several relatives). For all extents and purposes, it is mass which makes up the material world, from the mass of incredibly small elementary particles, to the mass of atoms and molecules, to the mass of a set of weightlifter’s barbells, to the mass of any coherent body. From a combination of these two perspectives (maya and mass), one might consider whether or not the mass defined by physics is also illusionary in the sense of having no fundamental nature.

From the perspective of modern physics, Puthoff, et al [1] have argued that “the concept of mass may be neither fundamental nor necessary in physics.” From their perspective, Einstein’s famous formula (in which mass can be equated with via E = mc2) is not about the conversion of one fundamental thing, mass, into another fundamental thing, energy; but rather “a statement about how much energy is required to give the appearance of a certain amount of mass.” If they are correct in their theorizing, “there is no such thing as mass; only electric charge and energy, which together create the illusion of mass.”

These authors point out that:

“The physical universe is made up of massless electric charges immersed in a vast, energetic, all-pervasive electromagnetic field. It is the interaction of those charges and the electromagnetic field that creates the appearance of mass.”

The means that the apparent weight of any object thought of as having mass, is nothing more than the interaction of electric charges and an electromagnetic field. This is basically the same as in the concept of Superstrings, where theory suggests that the void (i.e. nothing) forms infinitesimally small strings which wink in and out of existence, but which when focused together begin to make up the so-called mass of elementary particles.

The distinction between mass being real or illusion is important, in that it provides for gravitational theory to be united with electromagnetic and quantum theory in such a manner as to verify the reality of the “vast, energetic, all-pervasive electromagnetic field.” This field in turn provides a means for the interconnectedness of all things, the unspecified interaction of matter in Mach’s Principle, and the basis of Connective Physics.
 

 

 

Inertial and Gravitational Mass
Mass, from the traditional physics viewpoint, arises from two sources, its inertia and the gravitational attraction of other masses. This has led in physics to a distinction between inertial mass and gravitational mass -- a distinction which can be easily demonstrated in a simple Experiment. One can be thought of as resistive force to change in motion (speed and/or direction), while the other stems from an attractive force between masses.

Gravitation seems a simple concept, wherein two objects with mass are attracted to each other, dependent upon the inverse square of the distance between them, their respective masses, and a Gravitational Constant. Why these masses are attracted to each other is never really addressed, while the means by which a force connects them -- what physics thinks of as “action-at-a-distance” -- has been under debate since Galileo. Or longer. Thus gravity, while experientially easy to deal with -- i.e. no support, one fall down! -- the physics itself is still in flux.

 

(To add insult to injury, there is evidence from such a diverse field as Hyperdimensional Physics to suggest that the Gravitational Constant... is not a constant, and has changed notably over the eons. Even some 0.06% in the last twenty years or so! It may be just a matter of time before “what goes up... stays”, i.e. Levitation and/or the worst fears of the Anti-Gravity Defamation League come true.)

Inertia’s case, on the other hand, is even more difficult. Galileo’s attempt was to define inertia as a property of matter that kept an object in uniform motion, unless acted upon by a force external to the object. Sir Isaac Newton formalized this in his Principia, and in his first and second laws. His first law is actually a special case of the second, the latter which states that the acceleration (a) -- change in velocity (speed and direction) is proportional to the force (F) applied on the object, and that the constant of proportionality is the mass (m). I.e. F = ma.

 

Inertial mass can thus be viewed as the resistance of an object to being accelerated by an external force. When there is no force, or when the force ceases, the acceleration is zero, and the object moves in uniform motion (maintaining the same speed and same direction). Massive objects are therefore assumed to resist acceleration because such resistance is an innate property of matter. It’s a questionable assumption.
 

 


Mach’s Principle
Newton was never able to his own satisfaction, explain inertia. 200 years later, an Austrian physicist and philosopher, Ernst Mach, tried to explain inertia in what later became known as Mach’s Principle. This principle assumes, among other things, that,

“a particle’s inertia is due to some (unfortunately unspecified) interaction of that particle with all the other masses in the universe; the local standards of non-acceleration are determined by some average of the motions of all the masses in the universe, and all that matters in mechanics is the relative motion of all the masses.”

The principle goes on to imply the existence of “interactions between inertia and electromagnetism.” [2]

Mach’s Principle can be viewed as an entire universe being altered by changes in a single particle -- much in the same manner as hurricanes and tornadoes occurring in Florida because of an El Nino weather pattern in the Pacific Ocean, or perhaps more aptly, the flapping of a butterfly’s wings in Peru causing rains in Kansas.

The means by which such “actions-at-a-distance” can be interconnected (whether through the exchange of elementary particles, or some “unfortunately unspecified” means) has a long history in physics. It stems originally from Newton’s concept of an Absolute Space, the latter replaced by Maxwell’s “ether”, and more recently theories which encompass Mach’s principle.

 

Ultimately, we are left with the idea that Mach’s Principle implies that the whole universe matters locally. Furthermore, the interconnecting link of all masses in the universe -- the “vast, energetic, all-pervasive electromagnetic field” -- can now be likely identified as the Zero-Point Field. State-of-the-art physics is now demonstrating the truth of what sacred traditions have long assumed as an article of faith!
 


References

[1] H. E. Puthoff, Alfonso Rueda, and Bernhard Haisch, The Sciences (Vol 34, No 6, Nov/Dec 1994, pg 26-31).
[2] Rindler, W., Essential Relativity, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977.

Back to Contents


 

 


Spin

by Dan Sewell Ward
from LibraryOfHalexandria Website

The spin of an elementary particle (electrons, protons, neutrons, pions, et al) is a basic characteristic. It manifests itself in numerous ways, including the splitting of electron levels in atoms and nucleon energy levels in nuclei -- in accordance with the Pauli Exclusion Principle.

 

The fundamental question, however, is from where does the spin derive? In the case of a proton or neutron (collectively a nucleon), the spin supplied by quarks accounts for only 20 to 30% of the total. And the question of where the quarks derive their spin goes unanswered as well! Jaffe [1] has also noted, for example, that, “Much of the nucleon’s spin lies elsewhere.”

 

Furthermore,

“The nucleon is a highly relativistic bound state of quarks and gluons. It cannot, even in principle, be separated into its components.”

Peterson [2] in answering the question,

“Why do quantum particles exhibit the quality of spin at all?”, replies that in a fundamental sense, “we do not understand where it comes from or why it is there.”

Berman [3] has suggested that spacetime has torsion -- in effect “Torsion is to spin as curvature of spacetime is to mass.” Another plausible explanation is that the spin exists to prevent collapse of the particle’s charges. In the Casimir Effect, efforts to understand why the like charge fragments of an electron did not result in the electron coming apart.

 

It was suggested Casimir’s electronic electron shell might be a magnetic or Meisner Field, the very structure of the electron that of a minute superconducting sphere of like charges, and the electron depending upon its intrinsic spin in order to maintain it’s existence. Finally, one might consider that the three dimensions of “spin-space” briefly alluded to in Superstrings is the Torsion Space that Berman [3] has introduced.

In addition, the assumption that quantum fluctuations of quarks, gluons, of whatever, within the elementary particle might account for its spin, is a good example of staying in the box. Why not have the spin of any elementary particle derive its spin virtually from every other like particle? Effectively, a Mach’s Principle of Spin. It is the next logical step in any manifestation of Connective Physics.

 

References:

[1] Jaffe, R.L., “Where Does the Proton Really Get Its Spin?”, Physics Today, September, 1995, pg 24-30.
[2] Peterson, I. “Proton-Go-Round; Whence does the proton get its spin?”, Science News, Vol. 152, September 6, 1997, pg 158-159.
[3] M. S. Berman and R. M. Marinho, “Spacetime May Be Chief Source of Proton Spin,” Physics Today, September, 1996, pg 13-14.

Back to Contents

 

 

 


Superconductivity

by Dan Sewell Ward
from LibraryOfHalexandria Website

Superconductivity is infinitely more than a physics phenomena of the first order. It may be one of the fundamental linking mechanisms in an unlimited and connected universe. The physics is referenced, for example, in the Scientific References, but for those looking for a quick and dirty explanation, the following will provide an inkling of the immensity of the subject. Just keep in mind that any U. S. patent application which includes anywhere in its text the word “superconductivity” is automatically sent to the Department of Defense for review. That should be convincing evidence that this subject is worth investigating.

Most, but not all, conductors of electrical current, when cooled sufficiently in the direction of absolute zero (0 ºK, -273.15 ºC), become superconductors. The superconducting state itself is one in which there is zero electrical resistance and perfect diamagnetism. [1] This means that current flowing through a superconducting circuit does not experience i2R heating (current squared times the resistance), and the current can flow indefinitely.

 

Also, diamagnetism is the property of a substance to become magnetized in a direction at right angles to an applied magnetic field (Michael Faraday discovered the effect in 1846 that when such substances were brought near the pole of a strong magnet, they were repelled). The diamagnetism of the superconducting state is extraordinary in that it expels from its interior any external magnetic field(s) -- up to a limiting critical magnetic field strength.

The last factor is even more incredible when one realizes that when a conductor undergoes the transition to the superconducting state, the superconductor expels a pre-existing field -- a phenomenon known as the Meisner Effect. (The superconductor’s magnetic field is also called a Meisner Field, and is thus distinguished from the nature of other magnetic fields.) External magnetic fields do penetrate the superconducting Meisner Field to some degree, the penetration depth being temperature dependent (minimum penetration at 0 ºK, and infinite at Tc, defined as the Critical Temperature for the superconductor in question).

Inasmuch as it takes energy to expel a magnetic field from a superconductor, a magnet can under the right circumstances float freely above a superconductor at the point where the upward force generated by the field-expulsion energy balances the downward gravitational force. This dramatic phenomenon of magnetic Levitation becomes even more fascinating when one recognizes the Earth is effectively a magnet, and that a superconductor (being of somewhat less mass) could thus reverse the roles and float freely above the Earth.

The currently reigning theory with respect to superconductivity is known as the BCS theory (named after John Bardeen, Leon N. Cooper, and J. Robert Schrieffer). The BCS theory describes a pairing of conduction electrons by some interelectron attraction and a condensation of these pairs, “Cooper pairs”, to form a macroscopic quantum state. The superconductor’s electrical resistance is zero because the Cooper pair condensate moves as a coherent quantum mechanical entity, which atomic lattice vibrations and impurities cannot disrupt by scattering individual Cooper pairs in the same manner they scatter single conduction electrons -- the latter being the reason electrical circuits have resistance.

The critical elements in reaching the superconducting state are for conduction electrons to somehow form Cooper pairs, which then in turn automatically condense into a coherent flow, the “coherent” aspect being similar to that of a laser, i.e. everybody in step!

How the Cooper pairs are formed is obviously a critical factor in superconductivity. One theory is an electron passing by the crystal lattice of atoms in the conductor distorts the lattice in such a way the next electron is attracted to the lattice distortion. Or instead of the electron-pairing being mediated by lattice vibrations, the interaction of the conduction electrons may be due to charge or electron spin fluctuations in some electronic subsystem.

Note the emphasis on spin and fluctuations. From the discussions on Casimir Effect and Spin, we derive the concept of an electron consisting of an infinitely conducting shell, one with a minute magnetic field [i.e. a superconductor with Meisner Field]. Spin adds the critical ingredient of maintenance of the magnetic/Meisner field, while fluctuations (at the level of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle) connect via Hyperdimensional Physics all of the electrons in the superconducting state. But it gets better.

Two superconductors separated by a very narrow insulating barrier form what is known as a Josephson Junction. The Josephson mechanism is a general phenomena and applies beyond the special case of superconductors. There is, for example, a correlation among oscillating electric dipoles, the microscopic components of living systems. In effect, a pair of neighboring biological cells could represent the same model, as in superconductivity.

Researchers have in fact found evidence of Josephson-like phenomena occurring in living systems. Other effects suggested a Meisner effect -- and importantly, something which disappeared all together in a solution which was completely sterile biologically. This has led to the conjecture that room temperature superconductive effects exist in association with living cells. Further, the realization of nearby cells acting as a Josephson junction, yielded the conclusion that intracellular coherence would, through the Josephson effect, give rise to an intercellular coherence. Back to the laser; every cell in step!

An important aspect is that the oscillations of electric dipoles in living systems are able to produce coherent electromagnetic fields whose phase is locked to the phase of the matter field. An external electromagnetic field can become phase correlated only if its energy does not disrupt the coherence. Very strong electromagnetic fields can actually disrupt this correlation, or coherent structure, in a biological system. An external electromagnetic field can interfere with the fundamental processes of cell division, and conversely the cellular process can induce electromagnetic phenomena. [2]

And it’s all about superconductivity!

The implications are staggering, particularly in Consciousness research, where by some unknown means, human consciousnesses are interacting and influencing each other. Some of these interactions are effectively coherent interactions such as in a group meditating or praying with the same goal. The really fundamental question is the degree and manner in which the phenomenon of superconductivity is playing a role in consciousness.

Other research has shown that strong emotions can alter our DNA! No kidding. Thus we are faced with our emotions modifying our DNA, which in turn (along with our conscious mental effort and/or focus), influences the external world. And because such effects -- at least according to the implications of The Fifth Element, Zero-Point Energy, and similar research... because such effects are not limited by distance of linear time, we might want to rethink our even thinking (or getting emotional about) making anyone else emotionally upset.

 

Think of everyone else having PMS and a 45 caliber pistol. The only saving grace is that apparently the real power of emotions and/or mental focus are limited by the degree to which an emotional/mental consciousness can tap into the superconducting state.

In this regard, it is worth noting the research of David Radius Hudson. In one of his lectures (this one in 1995, in Dallas, Texas), he paints a coherent picture of a new reality. Excerpts from this lecture are included below:

Superconductivity is not electricity. Superconductivity is like a world of it’s own. A material that is a superconductor contains one vibrational frequency within it, a lot like a laser. The light flows perpetually within the system. No where in the system is there any voltage. You can’t hook up a wire here and a wire there to the superconductor and get current to flow in and out of it, because to get current off of the wire, you’ve got to have a voltage, and yet by definition a superconductor won’t allow any voltage. So the material’s a perfect insulator, not just a superconductor. But if you resonant frequency tune the wire so that the electrons vibrate at the same frequency as the superconductor, then the electrons will flow on as light, as electron pairs. They will pair up and flow on, because they’re seeking the path of least resistance which is the superconductor.”

“It’s different than an ordinary conductor and shouldn’t be thought of as electricity, because it’s light. An amazing thing is, if you resonant frequency tune a conductor to the frequency of the superconductor, the energy starts flowing, but it’s flowing as light. Any amount of light can exist in the same space-time. There’s only so much electricity can flow on the conductor, but light can flow on forever.”

“Around the superconductor a Meisner field is formed. The Meisner field has no north or south pole; it’s just a field, but it’s unique in magnetism in that it has no north or south pole. The size of the magnetic field is proportional to the amount of light that is flowing within the superconductor.”

“In the Ark of the Covenant was a pot of the Manna, and the stone through which God spoke to Moses. When Moses was up on Mount Sinai, he was smelting the Manna to the gold glass. Why do I say that? When you understand that in Old Kingdom Egypt these [hairy things over the eyes] were called bushes not eyelashes. These were bushes; check you’re Egyptian literature. The burning bush was the enlightened Third Eye.”

“So, Moses on Mount Sinai, when he looked upon the burning bush... That was just a mistranslation. It was the third eye opening and God communicated to him through this stone. God didn’t write on the stone. If he wrote on the stone, why would he put it in a box, seal it up and then let no one look at it? If God wrote on it, He would put it up on the wall where everybody could read it. When you realize that in Old Kingdom Egypt, on the holiest day in Old Kingdom of Egypt -- in the Sign of the Seal [by Graham Hancock] you read this -- they carried around an Ark on two poles, and in the Ark was a stone. Coincidentally what was in the Ark of the Covenant? A stone. The pot of Manna and the stone. The gold glass.”

“Around the Ark of the Covenant was the Meisner field. The strange thing about the Meisner field is that other Meisner fields that oscillate at the same frequency, can enter that field and not perturb it. So if you are a high priest, a Melchizedek priest, and you eat this Bread of the Presence of God every week, you are a light being, and you can enter into that field and approach the Ark of the Covenant and not perturb it because you’re in resonance with it. But if you’re an ordinary soldier or a person who thinks bad things, they have to tie a rope around your legs because as you approach it, it may have a flux collapse. Now if you can imagine several hundred thousand amps, and now you have voltage, it’s like a bolt of lightning. It literally is energy of an unbelievable magnitude.”

“As long as there is no voltage, you could touch it, you could feel it, it’s hundreds of thousands of amps, but no tickle, no tingle, because there’s no voltage. As long as you’re in resonance with it, you can approach it, you can touch it, you can hold it, you can feel it; Nothing! But if you’re not in resonance with it, and enter the field, and perturb the resonance, and there’s a flux collapse, and now you’ve got voltage... It’ll kill you.”

“Remember in the Bible that the Ark of the Covenant actually levitated and floated along, and actually carried some of the people who were carrying it. The only thing to do that’s a superconductor.”

 

References

[1] “The New Superconductors,” Frank J. Adrian and Dwaine O. Cowan, Chemical and Engineering News, December 21, 1992.
[2] “Magnetic Flux Quantization and Josephson Behavior in Living Systems.” E. Del Giudice, S. Doglia, M. Milani, C. W. Smith, and G. Vitiello, Physica Scripta 40, 1989.

Back to Contents

 

 

 


Superstrings

by Dan Sewell Ward
from LibraryOfHalexandria Website

Superstring Theory is often construed to have been formally initiated in physics in 1970 by Yoichiro Nambu. Prior to that time, elementary particles were analyzed in some cases as points -- an attribute which was clearly an approximation at best, and at worst, untenable. Even the idea that elementary particles were made up of quarks, was not wholly satisfactory, in that this concept had its own stable of problems.

However, a perhaps equally valid viewpoint is that “string theory” actually began with Pythagoras, whose philosophy centered about the power and harmony of numbers (e.g. the Pythagorean Theorem) and that mystical tetrakyts, or foursomes, held the secret to the universe. It is, after all, strings where we most easily encounter the harmonies.

Pythagoras’ theories have a lot of appeal, particularly in the manner in which the beauty of numbers correspond with the melodies and harmonies so pleasant to the ear. Eugene Wigner, a theoretical physicist has noted what he calls,

“the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics. Again and again, abstract and beautiful mathematical relationships explored for their own aesthetic sake, are later discovered to have exact correspondence with the real world -- a coincidence that is quite remarkable.” [1]

The unique relationship between mathematics and Music is but one example of this “unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics.”

Modern Superstring theories are based on generalizing the notion of a point particle to that of a string-like object.

“In an analogy to a string of piano wire, the lowest note of the string corresponds to massless or very light particles, such as the photon, graviton, or electron; the harmonics or higher modes of the string correspond to the very massive particles which modify the theory at high energies in a way that cures the divergences (infinitely large contributions to cross-section calculations) which have plagued quantum theories of gravity in the past.

 

Superstrings also incorporate Supersymmetry, a theory which predicts that each particle is accompanied by a superparticle with similar properties, (except that the spin must differ by one half unit). The superparticles are characteristically predicted to be heavier than ordinary particles.” [2]

Superstrings, themselves, are theorized to have a length of 10-33 centimeters, while the tension in the string is assumed to be as much as 1039 tons. [i.e. the superstrings are really intense!] This length is on the order of the Planck Length, where -- according to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, Zero-Point Energy, and other ideas in Connective Physics -- it is possible that particles are winking in and out of existence. Strings can theoretically twist and turn, spin and vibrate, tie and untie themselves, do the bossa nova and most any other thing the human mind can imagine.

The latter likely includes having sex, in that the interactions of superstrings are based on the “inevitable consequence of the topological nature of the strings themselves”[1]. When you think about it, the topological nature is pretty much what controls sex with humans! In addition, “strings are free to split and join [divorce and marriage], an open string break in two [schizophrenia], or join its ends to form a closed loop [hermit or closed mind].

Meanwhile, back at the relatively (pardon the pun) serious ranch...

According to relativistic restrictions, strings must be massless, with the ends of the strings moving at the speed of light. In order for the superstrings to represent particles with mass, the strings vibrate and rotate such that they generate a series of energy levels, just as a violin string has a series of notes. With Einstein’s E = mc2, these energy levels become the associated masses of the particles. (But then, as has been pointed out elsewhere, Mass may be illusionary, not really exist at all, and simply be the manifestation of electrical charge. Einstein’s equation is valid only to the extent the illusion is valid.)

Superstring Theory describes everything (from particles to forces), requires the existence of gravity (while point particle theories require gravity to not exist), and requires a reality of ten dimensions (26 dimensions in some of the earlier versions of the theory) in which to operate and for the strings to do their things -- including... whatever. These additional six (or 22) dimensions provide a whole new gamut of opportunities for speculation.

Space and Superstrings are fundamentally intertwined. The theory demands that strings create their own dynamic space-time, rather then simply being a part of an already existing continuum. Space itself can be enormously modified by black holes, who upon collapsing into themselves create the possibility of a singularity in space (the mathematical physicist’s nightmare). However, in Superstring theory, there is the possibility that when a black hole (a collapsing massive star) reaches the magic 10-33 centimeters, vibrating superstrings, while not eliminating the black hole, may help avoid the singularity. Whew! Close!

Meanwhile the additional six (or 22) dimensions are accounted for in Superstring Theory by the simple (and charming) expedient of compactification. The idea is to curl up the additional extra dimensions into such a small radius (10-33 centimeters or less) that they become invisible. This sounds rather convenient, until one considers the theories of Zero-Point Energy, in which an extra dimension or two is particularly convenient in order to move energy intra-universally.

Take, for example, a two and three dimension analog, i.e. assume one has a circuit board with which to do all sorts of clever things electronically. Two dimensionally, many of the wires will overlap -- but not connect if the third dimension is utilized. From the two dimensional perspective the third dimension might not even be recognized, but its existence makes the 2d circuit board perform. If one lives in Flatland, the 3d contribution might likely appear magical. But from our 3d perspective, it’s no big thing.

EM forces may be caused by a curvature of an alternative (parallel?) space, and the transitions between these spaces (as modified by time) allow for the ZPE. Or perhaps the ten dimensions of Superstring Theory are (1) time, (2,3,4) gravitational space, (5,6,7) EM space, and (8,9,10) Spin Space, with the latter 6 “folded in” or “compacted”??

Harvey [2] has noted that,

“One of the unsatisfactory aspects of string theory is the lack of a simple fundamental principle which would explain many of its marvelous properties.”

A possible answer is one akin to Mach’s Principle -- i.e. the strings tie things together! <g>
 


References

[1] Peat, F.D., Superstrings and the Search for The Theory of Everything, Contemporary Books, New York, 1988.
[2] Harvey, J.A., “Superstrings,” Physics Today, January, 1987, pg S-27.
See also:
[3] Bailin, D., “Why Superstrings?”, Contemporary Physics, Vol 30 #4, 1989, pg 237.
[4] Schwartz, J.H., “Superstrings,” Physics Today, November, 1987 pg 33-40.

Back to Contents


 

 


The Fifth Element

by Dan Sewell Ward
from LibraryOfHalexandria Website
 


Introduction
By means of a simplified extension of Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetics, it is possible to theoretically postulate an “over-unity” energy system which requires no fuel of any kind, and, simultaneously, a propulsion system which requires no propellant mass.

The energy system need not burn, transform, or otherwise modify a fuel -- and thus there are no waste products, i.e. pollution. The propulsion system would actually transcend so-called “anti-gravity” systems or Levitation devices by virtue of the fact the new Inertial Propulsion system does not require a gravity field (such as the Earth) in order to achieve significant propulsive thrust. In both cases, by the “simple” expedient of tweaking the rest of the universe in a clever way, unlimited amounts of energy and thrust may be obtained.

This combination of an advanced energy and propulsion system, which would, among other things, enormously simplify space travel to the planets and beyond, is a direct result of assuming one additional term (i.e. a Fifth Element) in the equations of classical mechanics and/or electromagnetics. The Fifth Element depends upon the rate of change of acceleration in mechanical systems (acceleration of current in electromagnetic circuitry) as well as a time constant which is related to the apparent size of the system in question. The larger the time constant and/or the greater the rate of change of acceleration -- i.e. the more radical the change of pace -- the greater the effect.

Simultaneously, the same mathematics which demonstrate the reality of over-unity energy systems and inertial propulsion systems, also provide insight into the manner in which all aspects of the universe are connected, and furthermore, show that there are no upper limits to the available flow of energy via such connections. The mathematics are in fact a potentially quantitative restatement of what many of us have experienced numerous times in our lives.

 

Such experiences include everything from consciousness and creativity to spoon bending, homeopathy, chiropractic and other health practices, to karate, Crop Circles, and tornadoes -- as well as free energy and advanced propulsion systems! In fact, all of the above constitutes in part demonstrable verification of the mathematical theory.
 

 


Assumptions
Physical theories are nothing more than succinct mathematical approximations of reality. These approximations are in turn limited by the theory’s basic Assumptions (which may be stated or unstated). Unfortunately, these limiting, fundamental assumptions upon which much of physics depends are not always inclusive of the diversity of physical reality. Assumptions are clearly a fundamental aspect of what physicists like to call “The Laws of Physics”, but all too often the assumptions are not stated explicitly with the law.

 

This omission often results in a misinterpretation of the law, or a faulty assumption as to the applicability of the law in certain cases. The Laws of Thermodynamics are a noteworthy case in point, as are the Assumptions of Classical Mechanics.

In the realm of applicability where Classical Mechanics is still considered valid (i.e. non-relativistic situations), the premier example of this branch of physics, Newton’s Laws, are technically bound by certain assumptions. These include the fact that Newton’s Laws are only applicable to a mass without dimensions (i.e. a point mass) and one which is a rigid body. A second, perhaps more fundamental assumption is that the action-reaction of the Third Law is simultaneous. As it turns out, none of these assumptions are valid in many cases, and in general are only approximations -- albeit, some of the approximations can be entirely sufficient for many practical applications.

The assumption of absolute time (or simultaneity) when the action is at a distance is the critical factor. In general, the “reaction” of a body to an externally applied force can not be initiated simultaneously with the initial application (“action”) of the external force. This lack of simultaneity is due in part to the limitations of speed to below that of light (from electromagnetic theory) and in some cases below that of the speed of sound for mechanical systems. This profound restriction on Newton’s Laws brings time into the equation -- for example, a sudden surge (an “action”) of electrical current along a conductor will also result in an equal and opposite “reaction” -- but not simultaneously!

Even more noteworthy is the fact that sudden and abrupt physical acts or intuitive realizations follow the same framework. The point to be emphasized here is the laws of mechanics are applicable in the electromagnetic realm and vice versa, and that mechanics, electromagnetism, other areas of physics, everyday experiences, creativity, and consciousness are not separate or unrelated, but wholly interconnected.
 

 


Connective Physics
Connective Physics can, in general, be viewed as an extension of Classical Mechanics and/or Electromagnetism. The theory is based upon the addition of a single linear term, or element, to the traditional equations in order to account for extreme and abrupt (or sudden changes) in the rate of acceleration in either a particle or charge (or a larger collection of the same). Classical mechanics and electrodynamics utilize the same form of differential equations -- a significant factor in the commonality of the so-called different fields of physics.

 

The addition of a single linear term was first introduced by Davis [1, 2, 3], and discussed by Stine [4, 5], and effectively transformed the relevant equations from second order differential equations into third order differential equations.

A sampling of these equations are shown in the Mathematical Theory, along with technical comments on the Conservation of Energy, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle and a host of other related physical theories and experimental realizations. Interpretations of the theory are discussed here in some detail, but in a non-mathematical format. In this regard, for an essential understanding of the theory, it is sufficient to recognize the nature of what amounts to five entities or elements within those equations.

For example, each of the equations include an element (1) which is the initiation upon a system of a force (be it mechanical, electromagnetic, or otherwise -- i.e. an “initiating action”). This force is fundamentally oscillating or cyclical in nature. In fact, all dynamic systems in physics and engineering are cyclical in nature (or can be approximated as such with the proper mathematics). Fundamentally, the universe is based on Cycles, be they collections of trigonometric sine waves, or the business and stock market varieties.

The equations of classical mechanics and electrodynamics also involve three other elements, in addition to the first element; which in mechanics, include: (2) position (and the tendency to return to that position; as in a pendulum or spring), (3) resistance to motion (said motion being velocity or speed related), and (4) mass (or inertia), which is associated with acceleration.

In electrodynamics, specifically electrical circuits, the corresponding terms are:

(1) electromagnetic force

(2) electrical charge (or capacitance)

(3) resistance to current (or resistance to charge in motion)

(4) inductance, associated with the change in current or the acceleration of charge

For our purposes, we will view these first four elements as Force, Capacitance, Resistance, and Inertia (in their broadest possible sense).

In Connective Physics, a “Fifth Element” is added. If Capacitance, Resistance, and Inertia are representative of position (of a mass or electrical charge), change of position, and rate of change of position, the Fifth Element constitutes the rate of the rate of change of position (alternatively, the rate of change in acceleration in a mechanical system). In an electrical circuit, the Fifth Element is the acceleration of current (where current is in turn the rate of change of charge with respect to time).

The addition of this Fifth Element is in sharp contrast to the classical version where the time delay between the initiation of an action and the occurrence of a resulting reaction has been implicitly assumed to be zero. This Time Delay is physically significant in any system where there is a sudden or abrupt action and/or where the system by its size or nature is slow to react.

For example, if one wants to grab a tiger by the tail without any subsequent negative effects, this could be easily done if one is able to accomplish this before the “system”, i.e. the tiger, can react by keeping his tail out of your reach. Obviously, the “system” can be viewed as including the tiger’s response after you have a hold of his tail, i.e. the “larger system of the tiger’s retribution”. But if one is able, for example, to move faster than the tiger, even the “larger system” can be exited before a reaction hits home, so to speak. In effect,

“You can get away with anything provided you don’t get caught while you’re doing it, and you leave the system immediately thereafter!” [2]

In the same fashion, unlimited energy can be obtained from the universe for free provided that the means of extracting it does so in a manner which precludes having to pay the price of the reacting forces. The same can be said for intuitive insights, health treatments which connect with the rest of the universe, and other experiences. The Fifth Element is thus the mathematical representation of the results of a sudden impulse -- in whatever form it manifests -- and the potential ability to avoid, at least in part, the price to pay for having the impulse imposed in the first place.
 

 


Energy Systems
The theory of the Fifth Element and its differential equations (as described in the section on Mathematical Theory) -- along with their five elements -- can be used to determine the energy flow within a system. When this is done, we can obtain five expressions for the power or energy flow (per unit time) -- each expression determined by the nature of the elements: Force, Capacitance, Resistance, Inertia, and Time Delay (the latter being the essence of the Fifth Element.)

The first four of these elements yield expressions fully in accord with mainstream physics. For example, the Capacitance and Inertia terms, have very similar expressions, and essentially trade energy with one another. In an electrical circuit, this is the fluctuating power between the inductive (magnetic) and capacitive (electric) elements in the circuit.

The Resistance term is also as expected from classical theory, but is distinct from the Capacitance and Inertia elements by the fact that the power associated with Resistance is one-directional. Known in electricity as i2 R heating, the Resistance element always acts as a load, generating heat and effectively radiating this energy to the external world. Critically important, the direction of the energy flow is FROM the circuit TO the outside world, i.e. TO the rest of the universe. This does not change.

The Time Delay, on the other hand, is something quite phenomenal! The mathematical form of the Time Delay element is in essence identical in form to the Resistance element -- except for an all important change in sign. If we assume the Time Delay factor (and the inductance or mass) to be positive quantities (which in anything remotely resembling classical or modern theories is true), then the Time Delay element implies nothing less than that there is a rate of energy being supplied TO the circuit FROM the external world!
 

 


Resonance
In physics, there is the potential for “resonance” in any dynamic system -- be it mechanical or electromagnetic. Resonance events can occur in virtually any system, and are regularly encountered in “transient” events (as opposed to “steady state”). Engineers and scientists have traditionally avoided transient events like the plague -- inasmuch as these things tend to “blow up” -- and thus have made it an article of faith among the purveyors of physics and science’s practical applications to find ways to reach the steady state condition as rapidly as possible.

 

The reality, however, is that it’s in the transient conditions that the action really exists and where there is the potential for unlimited benefits. It just takes a bit more care in achieving and handling the results.

Mathematically, resonance occurs when a denominator term anywhere in the equations goes to a minimum (or zero), thus implying a maximum (including infinity) for the term as a whole. In the equations of classical mechanics and electromagnetics, terms within the denominator can in fact go to zero, but the denominator itself never goes to zero. This is because of the “Resistance” term, which can never be zero, and which can not be countered by another term. This is all in accordance with mainstream physics.

In Connective Physics, however, the Resistance element can be countered by the Time Delay element (i.e. due to the addition of the Fifth Element). Thus, under certain circumstances, the entire denominator in the expression can in fact go to zero, and thus yield an “infinite” answer. In effect, there is no limit to the response of the system!

This potential for resonance, when combined with the universal connectedness of the energy flow (described above), implies that there is apparently no limit in the rate or amount of energy which might be supplied by the external world to the system.

In effect, the Time Delay Fifth Element might very well be an infinitely sized, universal source of energy and power! And similar to the Resistance term, it is limited strictly to one direction of energy flow. It’s just that for the Fifth Element the flow is from the universe to the local system.

Furthermore, the addition of a Time Delay Fifth Element implies that an electrical circuit (or mechanical system or any other physical system) is NOT isolated from the rest of the universe, and that the law of conservation of energy in a closed system is inapplicable in that the “system” now constitutes the entire universe!
 

 


Scientific and Mathematical Connections
In delving into the equations of Connective Physics, numerous connections become noteworthy. One example is to mathematically assume a zero Resistance and an unlimited Capacitance. This might be related to the real, practical world of reducing one’s tendency to resist outside forces (on the basis of “resistance is the cause of pain”), and at the same time to assume an unlimited capacitance of the universe in providing for any and all needs.

 

While in real physical systems (and possibly mental and emotional ones as well) there is always some resistance and a finite capacitance, we can always look at such small effects as acting as minor corrections, modifications, or perturbations. Mathematically, we can make the assumption of zero resistance and infinite capacitance and then consider that this is the ideal to which we aspire (but do not necessarily ever quite achieve).

The assumption of a zero resistance and infinite capacitance leads quite simply to solutions to the equations which yield as their roots the numbers 0.618033987... and 1.618033987... i.e. the Transcendental Numbers associated with the Golden Mean (or Golden Ratio) of Sacred Geometry. In this manner, quite surprisingly, the equations of Connective Physics are seen to connect in a straightforward manner with the elements of geometry on its most fundamental level.

Sacred Geometry relates in turn to philosophy, nature, the human body, and what is becoming increasingly appreciated as the most fundamental aspect of human existence. What was recognized in ancient times, is undergoing a resurgence of enthusiasm, and in the process allowing for an understanding of the phrase, “the universe is geometry.”

In Astronomy, the orbits of all of the planets of our solar system, for example, are related by sacred geometry. This can be seen in the Harmony of the Spheres (or graphically in A Book of Coincidence), where even the sizes of the planets are connected in this manner. The latter refers specifically to the fact that the ratio of the orbit and size of Earth to that of Mercury’s size and orbit have the same Golden Ratio connection. Earth and Saturn’s orbits and sizes are also both connected by the same geometry.

The appearances of Crop Circles have also shown a heavy influence on geometry. But in this case, the apparent construction of anomalous crop circles (those not obviously made by humans) also appears to depend upon the sudden bending of stalks without breaking the stems. Typically, this involves an “explosion” in the nodes of the plant, such that a ninety degree right angle is “easily” attained without disturbing the plant’s ability to continue to grow (albeit now horizontally). This bending without the reaction of breaking is just one of many manifestations of the Fifth Element.

A basic aspect of Connective Physics is the time delay between action and reaction. This leads to the idea of an Advanced Propulsion System which achieves an “action” (a forward thrust) without requiring an equal reaction in the opposite direction. Effectively this reduces the need for what is referred to as “reaction mass” or “propellant.”

 

In effect, nothing has to be forced in one direction in order to achieve thrust in the opposite direction. There is no water for an oar to push against, no air for a propeller to push against, and no rocket propellant thrown backwards upon which the rocket ship pushes against. Instead, an advanced propulsion system uses inertia, and indirectly, inertia’s connection to the rest of the universe, for its motive force. (The latter inertial connection is part and parcel of Mach’s Principle.)

Over-Unity Energy Systems are those systems where the efficiency of a mechanical or electromagnetic device exceeds 100%, i.e. greater than 1.00. This implies obtaining more energy from a system than is input to the system in order to cause it to function. Connective Physics allows for the possibility of such a system, whereby the act of tweaking the universe in just the right manner provides for unlimited amounts of energy to be transferred from the universe to the local system in order to be used in what ever manner seems appropriate. Numerous Over-Unity, “Free Energy” or “Space Energy” systems have been suggested, and are discussed separately under Zero-Point Energy.

Hyperdimensional Physics is the inclusion of additional spatial dimensions in our current theories of physics -- just as the more in-fad theories of Superstrings involving anything from 10 to 27 dimensions -- and can be shown to result in the potential of tapping into the Zero-Point Energy and achieving over-unity energy systems.

 

Hyperdimensional Physics, in particular, involves an always changing configuration of the dynamical system, and while many of the changes in planetary or solar activity may appear to have very long time periods associated with them, the size of the systems -- and thus the ability for one system to respond to another -- are (quite literally) astronomical! (pardon the pun) Thus, the Fifth Element term, which involves both the quickness of an action, and the time delay to precipitate a reaction, is likely to be involved in this branch of physics as well.

Sonoluminesence is an anomaly where air bubbles in water subjected to sound waves have been found to generate light. The light emission occurs whenever the air bubbles collapse. Notably, the collapse of the bubbles involve enormous accelerations and rates of acceleration changes.

 

It seems highly likely that the phenomena of sonoluminesence involves the Fifth Element of Connective Physics and may represent an over-unity energy source. In other physical experiments involving cavitation (the collapse of bubbles on propellers or other moving objects in water), over-unity energy production has been suggested as well, and Connective Physics tends to also explain these facts.
 

 


Experiential Physics
Given the above scientific and mathematical demonstrations, whereby access to a universal energy source is both possible and potentially unlimited, we can also consider if this mathematical theory is supported by experiential physics -- i.e. the kind of situations any of us might encounter in the daily course of our lives.

 

For example:

  • Tornadoes.

    In the aftermath of the tremendous winds of a tornado, discoveries of pieces of straw embedded vertically in plates of steel have been encountered. If one thinks in terms of the “difficulty” of penetrating a steel plate with a piece of straw, there would be a tendency to dismiss the possibility out of hand. But if the straw arrives at the plate with sufficient speed, and penetrates the steel plate before the plate can react to the straw (and thus bending or breaking the straw), then the possibility becomes a distinct possibility.

     

    The solution to the possible enigma is that the straw “entered the system” and embedded itself before the “system of the steel plate” could react. Significantly, the straw undergoes an enormous deceleration -- a radical change of pace -- and it is this change of pace which makes the Fifth Element term large in comparison to the other elements.
     

  • Hammering.

    When one hammers a nail, a curious, typically unconscious aspect of the act is that after bringing down the hammer on the nail head, the hand will suddenly and automatically loosen its grip on the hammer the split second before the hammer hits the nail. This results in protecting the hand from the jarring effect of the hammer hitting the nail (i.e. the reaction -- leaving the system to avoid paying the price). The alternative is to feel the full impact, a thoroughly unpleasant effect -- which we’ve learned instinctively to avoid. The effect is even more noticeable when wielding a sledge hammer!
     

  • Spoon Bending.

    A key element in the rather esoteric ritual of spoon bending is that the practitioner accomplishes the actual feat in a very brief time. After massaging the spoon for some time, the individual will often feel a brief, subtle, and sudden intuition of “now!”. If the persons reacts accordingly, the spoon is quite literally formed into a metal pretzel. If, on the other hand, there is hesitation, the moment is lost and the spoon keeps its original shape. The key is the sudden impulse (at just the appropriate moment)... And perhaps the consciousness of the individual (see below).
     

  • Homeopathy and Chiropractic.

    In the process of preparing a homeopathic remedy by repeated dilutions, a common practice is hitting the resulting vial against one’s palm for a specific number of times. In effect, the vial is being “hammered” or “impulsed” in accord with the tenants of Connective Physics, and thus connecting with the universe at large as part of its procedures. The same conditions exist in Chiropractic circles, where the practitioner jerks or provides a sudden impact to the spine or other body parts in order to correct a misalignment or unbalance within the body.
     

  • Head Banging.

    A popular new technique in the movies is the banging of heads in order to knock one person unconscious, while the initiator of the action escapes without so much as a headache. This appears totally nonsensical to the average scientist (except in Movieland), but in fact is entirely plausible. If the initiator of the head banging does his deed by hitting the other person’s head and very quickly retracting his head, he can avoid the “equal and opposite reaction” of the other person’s hard skull, and thus accomplish his nefarious deed without pain. Meanwhile, the other person receives the full brunt of the banging. Such a process might seem decidedly a movie gimmick, except for Karate. I.e.
     

  • Karate.

    A typical demonstration of Karate is the use of one’s unprotected fist to break a concrete block. An essential element of Karate is the use of sudden force which is very quickly retracted (as distinct from a “follow through” hit where the fist continues in the direction of the object.) In effect, the Karate hit enters the system, does the damage, and then exits before the system can fully react and impart a reaction hit upon the fist. This not only increases the power of the hit (doubling the effective impact by doubling the rate of acceleration of the fist), but saves the fist from whatever “retribution” the struck object might inflict via an action-reaction scenario.
     

  • Bruce Lee.

    Easily the most famous artisan of the martial arts, Bruce Lee has been known to send opponents flying fifteen feet with the movement of one of his fists only moving an inch or two toward the unfortunate recipient of his supposed wrath, and quickly retracting in order to avoid the backlash of the action. The mathematics of Connective Physics seems to explain Bruce Lee’s prowess as well. However, there might be a bit more to it. For example, his state of mind, i.e. consciousness, what might be termed the Bruce Lee Effect.
     

  • Consciousness.

    The apparent universal connection of an individual consciousness to other individual consciousnesses -- as described countless times outside of this website, as well as briefly in ESP -- suggests a connection between this fundamental aspect of human existence with the Fifth Element. Connective Physics, for examples, implies the absence of closed systems in the classical sense (except those, possibly, the size of the universe). In other words, all things are connected, including thoughts. In addition, individual consciousness can be described as taking unconnected and chaotic properties and then correlating them into an ordered structure.

     

    Consciousness is thus anti-entropic to the extent of the universe being anti-entropic. Both consciousness and Connective Physics can thus be construed to have the same universal anti-entropic properties -- i.e. both allow for an increase in the order of local systems (instead of the Entropy requirement of a decrease of order in any “closed system”).

We might also note that Arthur Young [6] refers to what we have termed the Fifth Element (or the mathematical third differential term) as “control”, and in doing so implies strongly that consciousness is the fundamental aspect of the physics’ added term. We would be in strong agreement with Mr. Young.
 

 


Conclusion and Applications
Based on the gamut of the mathematical results (most of which are not shown in detail in this brief treatise, but are included in Mathematical Theory and More Math), we can summarize the following postulates regarding a few of the key aspects of any physical or other action:

1) The universe always contributes (i.e. is always connected energetically).

2) At steady state conditions, the universe’s contribution is extremely small (becoming neglectable after long periods of steady state behavior).

3) Change or transient conditions implies an increased universal contribution (i.e. when change is initiated, the universe responds accordingly).

4) The universal contribution is dependent upon the degree of change initiated -- the greater the change, the greater the universe’s contribution.

5) The greater the rate of change, the greater the universe’s contribution.

6) The system Time Delay (which is dependent upon both the size of the system and the transmitability of information within the system) determines the amount of universal contribution.

7) Local energy must be put into the system to initiate a universal reaction.

Fundamentally, Connective Physics confirms mathematically that the universe is connected and that there are no limits.

The degree to which we can actualize access to the unlimited universal connection is based on sudden realizations, quick conscious decisions, creative insights, and abrupt “pivots” in our direction of thinking and/or action. One example might be a readiness to love at a moment’s notice (and then the willingness to “let go” even quicker). In general, it’s having a conscious thought, and then letting it go, knowing it has already manifested (e.g. in “parking prosperity” -- where one visualizes a convenient parking space, immediately lets it go, and then easily finds it upon arriving at their destination).

An easier adherence to Sacred Geometry can also be had through:

1) the elimination or reduction in resistance and a corresponding sense of unlimited capacitance

2) going with the natural flow of the geometry of the situation.

All of this can be thought of as accentuating the positive (i.e. acknowledging no limits to capacity, love, or joy), and eliminating the negative (no resistance, going with the flow, becoming “feather-weights”, and being unbounded by the flow channels). And with an adherence to Sacred Geometry, Connective Physics and the essence of Creating Reality, all of the universe seems to cooperate in an effortless manner.

And from there, it only gets more fascinating. Consider, for example, one reader’s feedback: The Fifth Element,

"connects the thought of ’serendipitous happenings’ to universal consciousness that is very interesting." Maybe.

 

It also raises questions -- i.e. Is "the term ’Local Energy’ a person’s expectancy of Good? Change, in my own present experience, appears to be on the increase and the concept of change is definitely something to ’deal with’. I must, and gratefully so, admit that several of the most recent changes have been remarkable via ’upgrading’.

 

"Another thought regarding Local Energy... Is becoming as mentally ’quiet’ as possible regarding apparent immediate change happenings to be a positive for focused Local Energy... i.e., a possible energy attraction for the contributions from the Universe. I am interested in the manifestations that occasionally appear instantaneously and then sometimes the manifestations seem to take lengths of time... and as to the ’why’ in the time frames. I think that Local Energy applies to something else or beyond ’physical energy doings.’ The physical doings seem to attract frustration, etc., so something else must be involved to attract positive intervention/contributions from the Universe." [7]

The student, for his or her own edification may want to answer these questions. Or better yet, visit Ming the Mechanic’s ruminations on the physics of reality, and the possible nature of singularities and additional dimensions. It’s a fascinating world!
 

 

References

[1] William O. Davis, private notebook, June 9th, 1961.
[2] William O. Davis, G. Harry Stine, E. L. Victory, and S. A. Korff, “Some Aspects of Certain Transient Mechanical Systems”, Presentation to the American Physical Society, April 23, New York University, 1962.
[3] William O. Davis, “The Fourth Law of Motion”, Analog Science Fiction/Science Fact Magazine, May, 1962.
[4] G. Harry Stine (Correy, L.), Star Drive, Del Rey, New York, 1980.
[5] G. Harry Stine, “Detesters, Phasers and Dean Drives”, Analog Science Fiction/ Science Fact Magazine, June, 1976.
[6] Arthur M. Young, The Geometry of Meaning, Robert Briggs Associates, 1976.
[7] Lila Hartman, Private Communication, 3/5/04.

Back to Contents